Coordinate basis vs local frame?

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
The wikipedia article on connection forms refers to a local frame. What is the relationship between local frames and coordinate bases? Are they the same thing? Is one a subset of the other?

The connection form article uses general notation e_\alpha for the basis elements instead of the partial derivative notation \partial_\alpha typically used for coordinate bases. Is it because not all bases are coordinate bases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is my understanding that 'local frame' is defined for any vector bundle (a basis of local sections), while the term 'coordinate frame' is reserved for the special case where the vector bundle is the tangent bundle of a smooth manifold, and the local frame is the usual basis of vector fields \{\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\}_i.
 
To my own amazement, I actually get it. Thanks, Landau.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...

Similar threads

Back
Top