Solve Highest/Lowest Points on Curve of Intersection with Lagrange Multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Lagrange multipliers to determine the highest and lowest points on the curve formed by the intersection of an elliptic paraboloid and a right circular cylinder. The user has identified critical points but is uncertain about classifying them as maximum or minimum. A participant questions the equation of the elliptic paraboloid, suggesting a possible error in the formulation. The conversation revolves around clarifying the mathematical approach and ensuring the correct equations are used for accurate results. The resolution of the classification of critical points remains a key concern.
Cherizzle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi There I would like help on a question about Lagrange multipliers.

Question: Consider the intersection of two surfaces: an elliptic paraboloid z=x^2 + 2*x + 4*y^2 and a right circular cylinder x^2 + y^2 = 1. Use Lagrange multipliers to find the highest and lowest points on the curve of the intersection.

What I have so far:
I managed to find my critical points using lagrange multipliers. But now I don't know how to describe whether my points are at maximum or minimum...
The points I found were: (2/3, -\sqrt{5}/3) and (-\sqrt{2}/6, 1)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Cherizzle. Are you sure that's supposed to be z=x^2 + 2*x + 4*y^2 and not z=x^2 + 2*x*y + 4*y^2
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top