Isn't this weird? (convergence of a sequence)

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the convergence of the sequence {n^2/(n^2+4)} to 1 using the epsilon-N definition. The argument suggests that demonstrating convergence to 1 is equivalent to showing convergence to any positive real number 'a', which raises questions about the uniqueness of the limit. It is noted that for small values of n, such as n=1, the inequality fails, complicating the proof. The conclusion emphasizes that while the sequence converges, establishing that it converges specifically to 1 requires careful consideration, ultimately leading to a derived condition for N. The final assertion is that any N satisfying N ≥ 2/√ε is sufficient for proving convergence.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
In order to prove, using the \epsilon-N definition, that the sequence

\left\{\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}\right\} = \left\{\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right\}

converges towards 1, I did the following: The sequence converges towards 1 if

\forall \epsilon>0, \exists N\in\mathbb{R} \ \mbox{such that} \ \forall n\in\mathbb{N}, n>N \Longrightarrow \left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\epsilon

We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

so if we can find the N for the creature on the right side of the inequality, it will also be true for the one on the left side. And then we solve and I spare you the following steps because my question is that if my line of reasoning is correct so far, then proving that there exist an N for the right member proves that there exists an N for

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-a\right|

where a in any positive real. So it doesn't REALLY show that the limit is 1 because should I try to prove that the limit is "a, any positive real", I would arrive to the same answer! All it shows is that the sequence converges. Right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

Actually, we don't. n=1 fails. For large enough n (3 or more), this inequality will be true.

However, you won't be able to bound the right hand thing above by an arbitrary \epsilon>0. Forget an arbitrary one, take \epsilon =1/5 and you won't be able to do it, since it's false for all n (any epsilon less than 1 will also fail).This thing starts at 1/5 and approaches 1, it's not getting arbitrarily small.
 
quasar987 said:
...

We have that

\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}-1\right|<\left|\frac{1}{1+\frac{4}{n^2}}\right|

so if we can find the N for the creature on the right side of the inequality, it will also be true for the one on the left side.

But can you ? Notice that this creature doesn't get smaller than 1/5...ever.

PS : shmoe's post wasn't up when I started...so ignore this.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks for pointing that out. I start again.

The sequence converges towards 1 if

\forall \epsilon>0, \exists N\in\mathbb{R} \ \mbox{such that} \ \forall n\in\mathbb{N}, n>N \Longrightarrow \left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\epsilon

We have that (with some luck),

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\left|n^2-1\right|<\left|n^2\right|=n^2

which is an easily tamed creature that produces an N that is true for all N such that

N\geq \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}

So my argument remains, that is to say, isn't it weird that since showing that this converges to 1 is the same as showing that it converges to any a, positive real. So it doesn't REALLY show that the limit is 1 because should I try to prove that the limit is "a, any positive real", I would arrive to the same answer! All it shows is that the sequence converges. Right?
 
quasar987 said:
We have that (with some luck),

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|<\left|n^2-1\right|<\left|n^2\right|

It's going to take a lot more than "some" luck !

Try n=1 and see what happens.

And I suggest you don't spend a whole lot of time trying more of these ...any such attempt must fail.
 
Last edited:
Bad luck!

I found another way of doing it (thanks to Fredrik's trick) that DOESN'T "cause" the paradox I was invoking, so it should be right this time! (notice I used the word "should" :wink:). Here we go again.

We have that, *crossing my fingers*

\left|\frac{n^2}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|\frac{n^2+4-4}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|1-\frac{4}{n^2+4}-1\right|=\left|-\frac{4}{n^2+4}\right|=\frac{4}{n^2+4}<\frac{4}{n^2}<\epsilon
\Leftrightarrow n^2>\frac{4}{\epsilon}\Leftrightarrow n>\sqrt{\frac{4}{\epsilon}}

we discarded the option that n was greater than minus the square root because it is trivial by n being a positive interger. So any N satisfying

N\geq \frac{2}{\sqrt{\epsilon}}

is fine.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top