Using conservation of momentum to find final velocity in a collision

AI Thread Summary
In a collision between two cars of equal mass, one traveling north at speed 2v and the other at speed v at an angle \phi south of east, the goal is to find the final speed v_final of the combined cars after they stick together. The momentum conservation equations for both x and y directions are established, but confusion arises regarding the components and their correct application. The x-direction equation must account for the second car's lack of momentum in that direction, while the y-direction equation combines both cars' momentum. The proposed solution involves squaring both equations and combining them to isolate v_final. Clarification on the equations and their components is necessary for accurate calculations.
elsternj
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two cars, both of mass m, collide and stick together. Prior to the collision, one car had been traveling north at speed 2v, while the second was traveling at speed v at an angle \phisouth of east (as indicated in the figure). After the collision, the two-car system travels at speed vfinal at an angle \theta east of north.

Find the speed vfinal of the joined cars after the collision.
Express your answer in terms of v and \phi .

6318.jpg

Homework Equations



p=mv
pi=pf

The Attempt at a Solution


first i tried to break this down in terms of its components

in the x direction:
m1v1icos\phi =(m1+m2)Vfinalsin\theta

in the y direction:
m1v1sin\phi+m22v = (m1+m2)vfinalcos\theta

Now here is where I am starting to get mixed up. I have both of my components. (They may be wrong so please help me with those equations) Do I just solve both for vfinal and then square them and take the square root? Any insight is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"in the x direction:m1v1icos + m2=(m1+m2)Vfinalsin"

I think maybe your equation got problem because direction x for v2 is zero so momentum for m2 also be zero.
If i m wrong please check it out ! thanks !
 
ah yes, i actually omitted that mass when i originally wrote it and then for some reason when looking at my paper i brought it back for some reason.. that was more or less a typo. i am aware that the second mass does not have momentum in the x direction, i will edit that.
 
If no going wrong my answer maybe like this:

First take it down then square both sides propose is remove the delta ,

(m1v1icos/(m1+m2)Vfinal)2 =sin2
-----1

[(m1v1sin+m22v)/(m1+m2)vfinal]2 = cos2----2

1+2 :

(m1v1icos/(m1+m2)Vfinal)2+[(m1v1sin+m22v)/(m1+m2)vfinal]2=1

After that take up [(m1+m2)Vfinal]2 shift it to right then remove the square so that my answer .
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top