What is the Proof for the Bessel Differential Equation Solution?

In summary: Well, this is what I get:x^{2}J_{0}''(x)+xJ_{0}'(x)+x^{2}J_{0}(x)=0x^{2}J_{0}''(x)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{2n}{n!}a_{n}x^{n}xJ_{0}'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n}{n!}a_{n}x^{n}x^{2}J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}a_{n}x^{n
  • #1
DivGradCurl
372
0
I'm supposed to show that

[tex] J_0 (x) = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} x^{2n}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } [/tex]

satisfies the differential equation

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) + x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) + x^2 J_0 (x) = 0 [/tex]


Here's what I've got:

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) = x^2 \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} \left( 2n \right) \left( 2n-1 \right) x^{2n-2}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n+2} \left( 2n+4 \right) \left( 2n+3 \right) x^{2n+4}}{2^{2n+4}\left[ \left( n+2 \right) ! \right] ^2 } = \frac{x^2}{2} - x^2 J_0 (x) + x J_1 (x) [/tex]

[tex] x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) = x \sum _{n=1} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} \left( 2n \right) x^{2n-1}}{2^{2n}\left( n! \right) ^2} = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n+1} \left( 2n+2 \right) x^{2n+2}}{2^{2n+4}\left[ \left( n+1 \right) ! \right] ^2 } = - x J_1 (x) [/tex]

[tex] x^2 J_0 (x) = x^2 \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} x^{2n}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} x^{2n+2}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } = x^2 J_0 (x) [/tex]

Then, I get

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) + x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) + x^2 J_0 (x) = \frac{x^2}{2} - x^2 J_0 (x) + x J_1 (x) - x J_1 (x) + x^2 J_0 (x) = \frac{x^2}{2} [/tex]

which is not correct, except for when [tex] x=0 [/tex]. Can anyone help me find where I made a mistake?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is most easily done the other way around (it's easier to find the correct coefficients in a series solution):
Consider the initial value problem:
[tex]x^{2}J_{0}''(x)+xJ_{0}'(x)+x^{2}J_{0}(x)=0,J_{0}(0)=1,J_{0}'(0)=0[/tex]
Assume a series solution:
[tex]J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n}[/tex]
Then,
[tex]x^{2}J_{0}''(x)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n(n-1)a_{n}x^{n}[/tex]
[tex]xJ_{0}'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}na_{n}x^{n}[/tex]
[tex]x^{2}J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}a_{n-2}x^{n}[/tex]
Or:
[tex]a_{1}x+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}(n^{2}a_{n}+a_{n-2})x^{n}=0[/tex]
for all x.
Hence, all odd "a"'s must be zero, while we must have for the even powers:
[tex]a_{2m}=-\frac{1}{(2m)^{2}}a_{2(m-1)}[/tex]
This can be rewritten in the form you seek..
 
Last edited:
  • #3
If

[tex] J_0 (x) = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} a_n x^n [/tex]

then

[tex] x^2 J_0 (x) = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} a_{n-2} x^n [/tex]

[tex] x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left( n-1 \right) a_{n-1} x^{n-1} = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left( n a_{n-1} x^{n-1} \right) - \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left( a_{n-1} x^{n-1} \right) [/tex]

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} n \left( n-1 \right) a_{n-1} x^{n} = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left( n^2 a_n x^n \right) - \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left( n a_n x^n \right) [/tex]

and so

[tex] \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \left[ \left( n^2 a_n - n a_n + a_{n-2} \right) x^{n} + \left( n a_n - a_{n-1} \right) x^{n-1} \right] = 0 [/tex]

I now see that the [tex] a_n [/tex]'s should all be zero, although I cannot obtain

[tex]a_{1}x+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}(n^{2}a_{n}+a_{n-2})x^{n}=0[/tex]

from what I've written based on your input. Furthermore, I don't see how you get

[tex]a_{2m}=-\frac{1}{(2m)^{2}}a_{2(m-1)}[/tex]

Also, it's not clear how I can work my way back from there.

To be honest, I really need to present a solution in the original form, because the directions from the book are specific about using the bessel function of order zero as the basis to obtain the proof. Thanks, anyway. :smile:
 
  • #4
Do NOT change the index on your first derivative series!

Secondly, J0 is DEFINED to be the solution of the initial value problem.
 
  • #5
I'm sorry. I see my remark is not clear enough. Well, my book says "show that J_0 (the Bessel function of order 0 given in Example 4) satisfies the differential equation"

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) + x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) + x^2 J_0 (x) = 0 [/tex]

So, the kind of answer expected is to follow from the definition provided by example 4, namely

[tex] J_0 (x) = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} x^{2n}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } [/tex]

which, of course, could alternatively be written as

[tex]J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n}[/tex]

However, we do run into a problem, since it does not provide the solution the way requested... do you know what I mean?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Well, if you find that the solution of the initial value problem coincides with the expression for J0, then you've given a fully valid proof.

Secondly, I'll continue:
If
[tex]a_{2m}=-\frac{a_{2m-1}}{(2m)^{2}}=\frac{a_{2(m-1)}}{2^{2}m^{2}}[/tex]
Then, by induction, you may prove that:
[tex]a_{2m}=\frac{(-1)^{m}}{2^{2m}(m!)^{2}}=-\frac{1}{2^{2}m^{2}}\frac{(-1)^{m-1}}{2^{2(m-1)}((m-1)!)^{2}}=-\frac{a_{2m-1}}{(2m)^{2}}[/tex]
 
  • #7
What really puzzles me from my work is that the part I did myself was checked n times... and later I get to results such as

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) = \frac{x^2}{2} - x^2 J_0 (x) + x J_1 (x) [/tex]

and

[tex] x J_0 ^{\prime} (x) = - x J_1 (x) [/tex]

with the aid of Mathematica.

So, chances are... there is some mistake I made, and that ultimately gave Mathematica the wrong series. So, my question is: where is the mistake up there?
 
  • #8
What I'm trying to say is that although math gives the freedom to find the same solution through geometry and algebra, let's say, there is also the need to be consistent with the conditions you are given by the problem, as I explained you earlier. Please, don't get me wrong by saying this. I really need your help, but we do need to speak the same language.
 
  • #9
What I can say is that there is something wrong with

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) = \frac{x^2}{2} - x^2 J_0 (x) + x J_1 (x) [/tex]

the [tex] \frac{x^2}{2} [/tex] should not be there.

So, something must be wrong with

[tex] x^2 J_0 ^{\prime \prime} (x) = x^2 \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n} \left( 2n \right) \left( 2n-1 \right) x^{2n-2}}{2^{2n} \left( n! \right) ^2 } = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( -1 \right)^{n+2} \left( 2n+4 \right) \left( 2n+3 \right) x^{2n+4}}{2^{2n+4}\left[ \left( n+2 \right) ! \right] ^2 } [/tex]

which I cannot find myself.
 
  • #10
Your basic problem is that you don't use the same coefficients for x.
One place you use (2n+4) as your power, other places (2n+2).
This will most often result in miscalculations.
You need to bring the powers in x to the same power, otherwise you'll get a mess out of it.
 
  • #11
Let:
[tex]J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}[/tex]
Then:
[tex]x^{2}J_{0}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2(n+1)}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}=-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{2^{2(n-1)}((n-1)!)^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]xJ_{0}'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2n(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]x^{2}J_{0}''(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2n(2n-1)(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}[/tex]
Hence:
[tex]xJ_{0}'(x)+x^{2}J_{0}''(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{2^{2(n-1)}((n-1)!)^{2}}[/tex]
That is:
[tex]xJ_{0}'(x)+x^{2}J_{0}''(x)+x^{2}J_{0}(x)=0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
There is just one thing I cannot understand. When you differentiate the second time, doesn't the index change from [tex] n=1 [/tex] to [tex] n=2 [/tex], making it slightly different:

[tex] x^2 J^{\prime \prime} _0 (x) = \sum _{n=2} ^{\infty} \frac{\left( 2n \right) \left( 2n -1 \right) \left( -1 \right) ^n x^{2n}}{2^{2n} \left( n ! \right) ^2} [/tex]

If so, wouldn't you need to change its index back to [tex] n=1 [/tex]? I hope my guess is wrong, because I can see the cancellations you get otherwise.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Let's take it once more:
[tex]J_{0}'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}2nx^{2n-1}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}[/tex]
Your lowest power in "x" is therefor [tex]x^{1}[/tex]
Hence, when you differentiate that one you're left with a non-zero constant:
[tex]J_{0}''(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}2n(2n-1)x^{2n-2}}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}[/tex]
This is a perfectly acceptable representation of the series.

Note that your own flawed series representation of [tex]x^{2}J_{0}''(x)[/tex] starts at [tex]x^{4}[/tex]
and not at [tex]x^{2}[/tex] as it should.
This is probably the reason why you got a wrong result earlier.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I get your point. Now it's perfectly clear to me.

Thank you very much.
 

1. What is the Bessel differential equation?

The Bessel differential equation is a second-order linear differential equation that arises in many areas of physics and engineering, particularly in problems with circular or cylindrical symmetry. It is named after the mathematician Friedrich Bessel who first studied it in the early 19th century.

2. What is the significance of the Bessel differential equation?

The Bessel differential equation has many applications in physics and engineering, including heat transfer, fluid dynamics, electromagnetic theory, and signal processing. It is also used in solving boundary value problems in circular and cylindrical coordinates.

3. What is the general form of the Bessel differential equation?

The general form of the Bessel differential equation is:

x2y'' + xy' + (x2 - n2)y = 0

where n is a constant.

4. How is the Bessel differential equation solved?

The Bessel differential equation can be solved using a variety of methods, including power series, Frobenius method, and the Laplace transform. The solution typically involves finding the roots of the characteristic equation and using them to construct a series solution.

5. What are the special solutions of the Bessel differential equation?

There are two types of special solutions to the Bessel differential equation: Bessel functions and modified Bessel functions. Bessel functions are defined as the solutions to the Bessel differential equation with n equal to an integer, while modified Bessel functions are defined as the solutions with n equal to a half-integer.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
365
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
397
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
676
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
255
Replies
1
Views
142
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
611
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
414
Back
Top