Is the Speed of Sound Affected by Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cottonkat5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Sound
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how gravity affects sound and light waves differently. While light is influenced by gravity through the warping of space-time, sound waves are primarily affected by the gravitational force acting on the molecules that create them. The main effect of gravity on sound is described by the equation F=mg, which pulls molecules towards the gravitational source. Although gravity can create stresses in the medium through which sound travels, these effects are typically minimal in everyday situations on Earth. Overall, sound and light waves respond to gravity in distinct ways, with general relativity applying to light and classical mechanics to sound under normal conditions.
cottonkat5
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is in the wrong thread (my first time posting),

I know that light is affected by gravity (gravitational lensing), but is sound affected in the same way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The effect of gravity on a light wave is explained by general relativity, because gravity warps space-time.
Before general relativity, we had the equation F=mg, but of course light waves don't have mass, so this is why relativity was an important shift in the understanding of gravity.
Sound waves are made by the movement of molecules, these molecules have mass. so gravity effects sound waves in 2 ways: 1) F=mg causes the molecules to be pulled towards the source of the gravitational field. 2) the curvature of space-time has a similar effect on sound waves as it does on light waves.
For gravity sources with comparatively low density (such as the earth), the effect of gravity on the curvature of space-time is much smaller than the effect due to F=mg.
So, for sound waves, F=mg is the main effect of gravity on the molecules, but for light waves, the curvature of space-time is the effect of gravity.
Therefore sound and light waves are affected by gravity in different ways.
 
Actually, I think I am wrong. Gravity effects sound waves in only one way. And that can either be modeled by the theory that gravity warps space-time or the theory that gravity is a force. for sound, these two theories should give the same result.
But for light, the theory that says gravity is a force is incorrect. The theory saying that gravity warps space-time is correct for light waves.
therefore general relativity is correct for both types of waves, but F=mg only works for sound waves, (when the gravitational field isn't too large)
 
If we're talking about light and sound waves in the Earth's atmosphere, they are both bent towards the centre of the Earth because the density of the atmosphere is greater closer to the earth.
The effect of gravity on light and sound waves would be much less, but I think it would have the same effect
 
From a practical standpoint, where we care only about Earth's gravity...no. The molecules will experience the same gravitational force as they would when there is no sound wave at all.

The exception is a sound wave with an extremely long wavelength that could move particles considerably closer or further from a large mass.
 
Sound waves are vibrations in some medium (solid or fluid) and they are affected by the stress field in the medium. (Example - the speed of sound for transverse vibrations of a stretched string depends on the tension in the string, and therefore the vibration frequency depends on the tension).

So sound waves are affected by gravity is so far as gravity produce stresses.

Cleatly gravity CAN produce significant stresses in bodies, but there is not usually a simple relation between the stress field and the gravitational field that causes it. (Example - the tension in the string in the previous example could be produced by hanging a mass from one end of it).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top