Calculate Relative Speeds of Moving Objects for Twin Paradox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date Start date
Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
I understand the ideas behind relativity (4d space time, different speeds see different slices of it, what not), but I've never done the math.

If I have something traveling at v1 relative to some frame, and another thing traveling at v2, what is v2 transformed into the reference frame moving at v1?

I'm trying to model the twin paradox in a computer program.

Oh, and how do I calculate the slope of a reference frame relative to another reference frame? Is it just (+-)gamma?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to use the velocity-transformations.
 
Alkatran said:
If I have something traveling at v1 relative to some frame, and another thing traveling at v2, what is v2 transformed into the reference frame moving at v1?
Suppose you're on a train moving with velocity u relative to the ground, and you walk forward with velocity v relative to the train, your velocity relative to the ground is not u+v but (u+v)/(1+uv). (I'm using units in which c=1. Otherwise this would be (u+v)/(1+uv/c²).)

This is the relativistic velocity addition law.

You seem to be asking for a slightly different version of it (if I understand you correctly). Suppose a train is moving with velocity v1 relative to the ground, and some guy is walking with speed v2 relative to the ground, then what is this guy's speed relative to the train?

According to the velocity addition law it is (-v1+v2)/(1+(-v1)v2).

Alkatran said:
Oh, and how do I calculate the slope of a reference frame relative to another reference frame? Is it just (+-)gamma?
Suppose that another observer is moving with velocity v in the coordinate system where you are stationary at the origin, and that you both measure time from an event when both of your origins were at the same place, then his t axis in a spacetime diagram that represents your coordinates is a line through the origin with slope 1/v (remember that t is in the "up" direction), and his x-axis is a line through the origin with slope v. Each line that is parallell to his x-axis represents a set of events that are simultaneous to him.

Note that the when the astronaut twin has changed his direction, these lines of simultaneity ("slices" of spacetime that he thinks of as space at different times) will be very different from what they were before.
 
Alkatran said:
I understand the ideas behind relativity (4d space time, different speeds see different slices of it, what not), but I've never done the math.

If I have something traveling at v1 relative to some frame, and another thing traveling at v2, what is v2 transformed into the reference frame moving at v1?

That's just a velocity subtractin problem. Classically the answer is v2-v1, relativistically the answer is (v2-v1)/(1+v1*v2/c^2)

I'm trying to model the twin paradox in a computer program.

Oh, and how do I calculate the slope of a reference frame relative to another reference frame? Is it just (+-)gamma?

That would probably depend on how you draw the reference frame. In any event, you should be able to figure it out from the Lorentz transform.

I prefer the following version

[edit! Major ooops!]

x' = gamma*(x - v t)
t' = gamma*(t - v x)

where
gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2)

the inverse of which is

x = gamma*(x' + v t')
t = gamma*(t' + v x')

[end edit]

but note that the require that you use "relativistic" units, where time for example might be measured in seconds and distance in light seconds, or time in years and distance in light years.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
137
Views
10K
Back
Top