2 protons have less mass than combined

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cbray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
Cbray
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
I was reading an article about how two protons have less mass combined than by themselves to make helium, which gives off left over energy around 0.7% of their mass.

How is this possible? Why do they have less mass combined?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it backwards in your first line. Combined they have less mass. The missing energy is due to the binding energy that keeps them together in say, Helium.
 
Pengwuino said:
You have it backwards in your first line. Combined they have less mass. The missing energy is due to the binding energy that keeps them together in say, Helium.

So I'm guessing the amount of mass lost due to bindings is small? - And the energy left is for explosions ? :P
 
Yes, the mass lost is small (although the energy associated with that mass loss is huge by E = mc^2 compared to chemical reactions). That's what basically happens in nuclear reactions.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top