Observing Light Flash from 0.9999c Moving Body

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nitsuj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Flash Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observation of light flashes emitted from a body moving at 0.9999c, focusing on the perspectives of different frames of reference (FoR) and how the distances and timings of light pulses are perceived. The scope includes conceptual reasoning about relativistic effects and the nature of light propagation in different frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a body moves at 0.9999c and emits light pulses from two devices spaced one light second apart, questioning how this would appear from their frame of reference.
  • Another participant agrees that the time taken for the light to travel between the devices would be approximately 7.5 seconds from the observer's frame.
  • A participant speculates about the appearance of light rings from the moving body's perspective, suggesting that the spacing of these rings may not remain constant due to relativistic effects.
  • There is a discussion about the invariance of intervals as stated in Taylor & Wheeler, with one participant questioning how this applies to the perceived distances in different frames.
  • One participant asserts that the distance between the light pulse circles in the observer's frame is not one light second, but rather just under two light seconds due to the timing of the flashes and the motion of the body.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the representation of the circles in an animation shared, seeking clarification on what the colors represent and how they relate to the observations made.
  • A later reply acknowledges a mistake in understanding the distances involved, indicating a willingness to correct earlier claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the observations and measurements from different frames of reference, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on how the distances and timings should be perceived across the different frames.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of intervals and the implications of relativistic effects on the perception of light. The discussion also highlights the complexity of visualizing light propagation in different frames of reference.

nitsuj
Messages
1,387
Reaction score
98
A body moves at 0.9999 c, in my FoR i have placed two devices one light second distance apart. As the body passes right next to each device it (body or device) flashes a pulse of light. Would it look like this from my FoR?

UniverseSandbox-20111102-002653-226174.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, after about 7.5 seconds after the first flash.
 
I think this is what the body sees from its FoR, (not scaled with first picture, just to illustrate body is in the middle of the light rings).

UniverseSandbox-20111102-124545-2566.png



With the picture in the first post, I am guessing where the line crosses the circles the distance between is 1 light second, which is the distance between the light pulse triggering devices.

This spacing gets smaller towards the area of the body where the circles pretty much are in the same spot (picture in first post).




From my FoR, is the spacing between the cirlces (picture in first post) all of the same interval (as the 0.9999c body would measure, one light second)? I read from Taylor & Wheeler that intervals are invariant.
 
Last edited:
nitsuj said:
I think this is what the body sees from its FoR (body is in the middle of the light rings).
Your second image is what it looks like in the body's FoR, but it's not what the body can see. The only way observers can "see" traveling light is to put reflectors at equally-spaced locations with respect to themselves and then all they can tell is the round-trip speed of light measures to be the same for all of them. But they cannot conclude exclusively from any measurement or observation that the light looks like it does in the FoR. Each FoR defines the speed of light to be a constant in that frame which is the reason the two FoR's give a different image.
nitsuj said:
With the picture in the first post, I am guessing where the line crosses the circles the distance between is 1 light second, which is the distance between the light pulse triggering devices.
No, it's just under 2 light seconds. The flashes occurred 1 second apart so the radii of the circles will have a difference of 1 light second but the difference in the diameters is 2 light seconds.
nitsuj said:
This spacing gets smaller towards the area of the body where the circles pretty much are in the same spot (picture in first post).
Correct.
nitsuj said:
From my FoR, is the spacing between the cirlces (picture in first post) all of the same interval (as the 0.9999c body would measure, one light second)? I read from Taylor & Wheeler that intervals are invariant.
The difference in the center points of the two circles is 0.9999 light seconds.

Have you seen my animation that illustrates how two observers with a relative speed of 0.5c will both think they are in the center of an expanding circle of light that was emitted when they were colocated?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEhvU31YaCw
 
Thanks for the replies ghwellsjr

I see that in the first image the distance between the light pulse circles at the bottom is not 1 light second.

But I see it as the distance between the devices 1 light second + the time it takes the body to pass by each device and trigger the light pulses 1.0001 light seconds (1/.9999) so 2.0001 light seconds.

Your animation looks really cool, but I can't tell what the Green and Red circle represent. I am still trying to understand what I see in my single frame image :)

oh wait it looks like the yellow circles that follow each FoR illustrates the transformation and reflects the light pulse back to the observer (so they can measure of course :) The green and red circles are the reflection and show the time dilation (green collapses before red). Very slick
 
Last edited:
You are right, thanks for correcting my mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K