How Do You Build a Wave Transmitter for Destructive Interference?

AI Thread Summary
To build a wave transmitter for sound cancellation similar to noise-cancelling headphones, you need to set up a system comprising a microphone, an inverting audio amplifier, and a speaker. The microphone captures the unwanted sound waves, which are then processed by the amplifier to create a 180-degree phase shift. This inverted audio is sent to the speaker, which emits the sound waves that interfere destructively with the incoming noise. Proper design and guidance are essential for successful implementation. Consulting with an expert can help navigate the process effectively.
a.glick
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How would I go about building a wave transmitter? Like in the noise cancelling headphones. I want to build a transmitter that absorbs sound waves, reflects them, and then shoots them out creating destructive interference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a.glick, Welcome to Physics Forums!

You need to call things by their correct names! In all sciences, using the correct term is the only way to communicate ideas with accuracy.

1. Sound waves are emitted by a transmitter. Example: a speaker
2. Sound waves are received by a receiver. Example: a microphone
3. Audio can be amplified by an amplifier.
4. Sound waves humans can hear is known as "audio"


Noise cancelling headphones receive sound from the local environment. The electrical circuits inside amplify and invert that audio. That is, it is phase shifted 180 degrees. Then that audio is sent to the earphones of the person wearing the headphones. When those waves meet up with the incoming waves they should totally cancel out. This is known as destructive interference, as you said. The result expected is the wearer does not hear any sound from the external enviroment.

So, what you want to build is very similar to noise cancelling headphones, just as you said. You need to design and build a receiver, an inverting amplifier, and a speaker.
 
Last edited:
so essentially i need to attach a microphone to a speaker. what am i supposed to use to create the phase shift of the wave?
thanks for your help bobbywhy.
 
a.glick, Visualize a simplified block diagram with 3 boxes:

1. Microphone
2. Inverting audio amp
3. Speaker

#1 feeds into #2 which feeds into #3.

Use the microphone to detect (receive) the sound you want to eliminate. Feed the output of the microphone into an inverting audio amplifier. Send the output of the amplifier to a speaker. Point the speaker towards the source of the sound. The inverted waves transmitted by the speaker will interfere destructively in midair with the sound waves you want to eliminate. Voila! Sound cancellation!

I suggest you consult with someone who can advise you and guide you through this process. It is not too difficult, but it seems to me you will need some help to make it work.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top