What is an effective variable substitution for solving this integral?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brendan_foo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding an effective variable substitution for the integral \(\int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} - x^2 (\sqrt{1-x^2}) - (1-x^2)^\frac{3}{2} dx\). Participants explore various substitution methods, including trigonometric substitutions and algebraic manipulations, while discussing the implications of these choices on the evaluation of the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using trigonometric substitutions, such as \(x = \sin{\theta}\) or \(x = \csc{\theta}\), to simplify the integral.
  • Others propose factoring the integrand to facilitate integration, leading to a different form of the integral.
  • A participant mentions that the integral can be split into three separate integrals for easier evaluation.
  • There is a claim that the integral evaluates to zero based on a trigonometric identity, though this is contested by others who believe the final result should be \(1/5\).
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of using reciprocal trigonometric functions and whether they complicate the process unnecessarily.
  • Several participants correct or challenge earlier claims, particularly regarding the simplification of terms and the evaluation of individual integrals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best substitution method or the final value of the integral. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness of trigonometric versus algebraic approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the evaluation of the integral involves complex calculations and may depend on specific substitutions. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the simplification of terms.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or practitioners interested in integral calculus, particularly those exploring different methods of substitution and integration techniques.

brendan_foo
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, could someone just suggest a variable substitution for me...just to get the ball rolling :

[tex] <br /> \int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} - x^2 (\sqrt{1-x^2}) - (1-x^2)^\frac{3}{2} dx<br /> [/tex]

Whenever I've seen [itex]\sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex] (and its usually the reciprocal of), I've used trig substitutions to wind up with an inverse trigonometrical function as the output, and then evaluating the integral. Either way, would something like [itex]x = \sin{\theta}[/itex] be a good choice here (or maybe [itex]x = \csc{\theta}[/itex]), or can it just be done in a regular fashion? Any hints would be great, nothing revealing but a nudge in the right direction would be ace, if possible.

cheers guys :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brendan_foo said:
Hi guys, could someone just suggest a variable substitution for me...just to get the ball rolling :

[tex] <br /> \int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} - x^2 (\sqrt{1-x^2}) - (1-x^2)^\frac{3}{2} dx<br /> [/tex]

Whenever I've seen [itex]\sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex] (and its usually the reciprocal of), I've used trig substitutions to wind up with an inverse trigonometrical function as the output, and then evaluating the integral. Either way, would something like [itex]x = \sin{\theta}[/itex] be a good choice here (or maybe [itex]x = \csc{\theta}[/itex]), or can it just be done in a regular fashion? Any hints would be great, nothing revealing but a nudge in the right direction would be ace, if possible.

cheers guys :biggrin:

Use this [tex]\int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} - x^2 (\sqrt{1-x^2}) - (1-x^2)^\frac{3}{2} \ dx<br /> = \int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} \ dx - \int_{-1}^{1} x^2\sqrt{1-x^2} \ dx - \int_{-1}^{1} \left( 1- x^2\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} \ dx[/tex]

And make substituion for each integral ...
 
For this one just do some factoring.

[tex] \int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\sqrt {1 - x^2 } } - x^2 \left( {\sqrt {1 - x^2 } } \right) - \left( {1 - x^2 } \right)^{\frac{3}{2}} dx[/tex]

[tex] = \int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\sqrt {1 - x^2 } \left( {1 - x^2 - \left( {1 - x^2 } \right)} \right)} dx[/tex]

[tex] = \int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\left( { - 2x^2 } \right)\sqrt {1 - x^2 } } dx[/tex]

I am not too sure about the substitution though. Maybe try some standard trig substitutions and then integrate by parts if needed?

Edit: I just tried using trig substitution with what I came up with. It ends up requiring quite a bit of working so it may not be the best method to use.
 
Last edited:
You know, (1 - x^2 - (1 - x^2)) = (1 - x^2 - 1 + x^2) = 0.
 
brendan_foo said:
Hi guys, could someone just suggest a variable substitution for me...just to get the ball rolling :

[tex] <br /> \int_{-1}^{1} \sqrt{1-x^2} - x^2 (\sqrt{1-x^2}) - (1-x^2)^\frac{3}{2} dx<br /> [/tex]

Whenever I've seen [itex]\sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex] (and its usually the reciprocal of), I've used trig substitutions to wind up with an inverse trigonometrical function as the output, and then evaluating the integral. Either way, would something like [itex]x = \sin{\theta}[/itex] be a good choice here (or maybe [itex]x = \csc{\theta}[/itex]), or can it just be done in a regular fashion? Any hints would be great, nothing revealing but a nudge in the right direction would be ace, if possible.

cheers guys :biggrin:
This integral
[tex]\int_{-1}^{+1} [\sqrt{1-x^{2}} - x^{2} (\sqrt{1-x^{2}}) - (1-x^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}] dx[/tex]

is dealt nicely by the substitution [itex]x\rightarrow \sin u[/itex],under which the limits of integration transform as follows:
[tex]-1\rightarrow -\frac{\pi}{2} ; +1\rightarrow +\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]
,and your integral becomes:
[tex]\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} (\cos u -\sin^{2}u\cos u-\cos^{3}u)\cos u du[/tex]
,which can be evaluated quite easily.
Split it in three integrals.Denote your initial integral by 'I'.Then:
[tex]I=I_{1}-I_{2}-I_{3}[/tex]
,where
[tex]I_{1}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^{2}u du[/tex]
[tex]I_{2}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{2}u\cos^{2}u du[/tex]
[tex]I_{3}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^{4}u du[/tex].

Use the fact that [itex]\cos^{4}u=\cos^{2}u-\cos^{2}u\sin^{2}u[/itex]
to express
[tex]I_{3}=I_{1}-I_{2}[/tex]
,from where u find that your initial integral (I) is:
[tex]I=0[/tex]


Daniel.
 
Hi, I managed to come to the integral(s) that you arrived to in the previous post, but I think I sucked up those integrations.

I know the final integral should be evaluated to 1/5, but its a really long winded little thing. I used [itex]x = \sin(\theta)[/itex] but the calculations went on for ages.

Could you use reciprocal trig functions, like cosec(x) or something and use those trig identies? or does that just make it un-necessary complication?

Cheers guys, much appreciated :biggrin: :biggrin:

tell me if you can arrive at one-fifth.
 
brendan_foo said:
Hi, I managed to come to the integral(s) that you arrived to in the previous post, but I think I sucked up those integrations.

I know the final integral should be evaluated to 1/5, but its a really long winded little thing. I used [itex]x = \sin(\theta)[/itex] but the calculations went on for ages.

Could you use reciprocal trig functions, like cosec(x) or something and use those trig identies? or does that just make it un-necessary complication?

Cheers guys, much appreciated :biggrin: :biggrin:

tell me if you can arrive at one-fifth.

I just showed you that,in order to evluate the initial integral,you have to make an obviuos substitution and no integration,as the result is proven to be zero by a simple identity involving trig.functions.

Consider the integrals:
[tex]I_{s}=:\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{2}x dx[/tex]
[tex]I_{c}=:\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^{2}x dx[/tex]

1.Use the fundamental formula of circular trigonometry to find
[tex]I_{c}+I_{s}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} 1 dx =x|_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}}=\pi[/tex]
2.Use the identity:
[tex]\cos^{2} x-\sin^{2} x=\cos 2x[/tex]
,to find that:
[tex]I_{c}-I_{s}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{+\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos 2x dx[/tex]
.Under the obvious substitution [itex]2x\rightarrow u[/itex],under which the limits transform as follows:
[tex]-\frac{\pi}{2}\rightarrow -\pi ;+\frac{\pi}{2}\rightarrow +\pi[/tex]
,u're gettin'
[tex]I_{c}-I_{s}=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\pi}^{+\pi} \cos u du =\frac{1}{2}\sin u|_{-\pi}^{+\pi}=0[/tex]
So:
[tex]I_{c}=I_{s}=\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]
.And should be the first integral [itex]I_{1}[/itex]
For the second,use the trigonometrical identity
[tex]\sin^{2}x\cos^{2}x =(\frac{1}{2}\sin 2x)^{2}=\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2}2x[/tex].
And then the integral,by a substitution [itex]2x\rightarrow u[/itex] could be put in relation with [itex]I_{s}[/itex] computed above.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
I just showed you that,in order to evluate the initial integral,you have to make an obviuos substitution and no integration,as the result is proven to be zero by a simple identity involving trig.functions.

You don't have to involve any trigonometric functions, see Benny's post and my correction to it.
 
You're right,but the trig.stuff is needed to evaluate each integral in term.He was convinced that the final result would be zero,but he asked whether the last integral (I_{3} as i depicted it) was 1/5 or not...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Hey are any of you guys on an IM facility, like MSN or yahoo...wouldn't mind having a proper chat with someone, I can see that in comparison to many, i am waaaaay behind.

brendan_online@hotmail.com if you could talk to me on MSN


thanks for your patience :smile:
Cheers guys
 
Last edited:
  • #11
You're right,but the trig.stuff is needed to evaluate each integral in term.He was convinced that the final result would be zero,but he asked whether the last integral (I_{3} as i depicted it) was 1/5 or not...

Aha, I interpreted "final integral" as "I".
 
  • #12
Muzza said:
You know, (1 - x^2 - (1 - x^2)) = (1 - x^2 - 1 + x^2) = 0.

Oops, I made an error with my simplification. :redface: :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K