Is the function f(x)=1/x bounded on the interval (0,1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter k3k3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
k3k3
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f be the function defined f(x)=1/x. Prove that f is not bounded on (0,1)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I should prove by contradiction.

Assume f is bounded on (0,1).
Since f is bounded, there exists a real number M such that |f(x)| ≤ M for all x in (0,1)
f(x) will never be negative since it is on the interval (0,1), hence |f(x)| = f(x)

This is where I begin to get unclear on where to go next. I want to show that M+1 ≤ M
Is it correct to use 1/(M+1) and plug it into f(x)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you should prove it by contradiction. If n is an number greater than one then 1/n is in (0,1).
 
Last edited:
Can I argue that since 1/n is an infinite sequence, then this function is not bounded?
 
k3k3 said:
Can I argue that since 1/n is an infinite sequence, then this function is not bounded?

You need a better argument than that. What is f(1/n)?
 
f(1/n)=n

Then I could say for all n in the positive integers?
 
k3k3 said:
f(1/n)=n

Then I could say for all n in the positive integers?

You could say that, but it doesn't prove f is unbounded until you say why that proves f is unbounded.
 
Since f(1/n)=n for all n in N. Since N has an infinite amount of elements, then the function is unbounded on (0,1)?
 
k3k3 said:
Since f(1/n)=n for all n in N. Since N has an infinite amount of elements, then the function is unbounded on (0,1)?

Having an infinite number of elements has little to do with being unbounded. What does unbounded mean?
 
That there is no lower bound, no upper bound or both.
 
  • #10
k3k3 said:
That there is no lower bound, no upper bound or both.

Ok, so give me an argument that f has no upper bound.
 
  • #11
There is no n such that 1/n is not in the interval (0,1), so there is no real number M that will satisfy |1/n|≤M.
 
  • #12
k3k3 said:
There is no n such that 1/n is not in the interval (0,1), so there is no real number M that will satisfy |1/n|≤M.

You don't want to satisfy |1/n|<=M. You want to show that you can find a number in x in (0,1) such that f(x)>M.
 
  • #13
So if M is greater than one, 1/(M+1) is in (0,1) and M+1 < M is not true?
 
  • #14
k3k3 said:
So if M is greater than one, 1/(M+1) is in (0,1) and M+1 < M is not true?

I really hope you meant f(1/(M+1))=M+1 > M.
 
  • #15
No, I was still thinking about the contradiction argument. Sorry.
 
  • #16
k3k3 said:
No, I was still thinking about the contradiction argument. Sorry.

That's ok. But you've got it now, yes?
 
  • #17
Yep. Thank you again for your help!
 
Back
Top