Meaning of totally antisymmetric tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Simple question I am confused on. If I have a tensor M^{\alpha\beta\gamma} that is totally antisymmetric in its indices then is it the case that M changes sign under the exchange of any two indices? And as a followup, a totally symmetric tensor has no sign changes on any pair exchange of indices?

Thanks,

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of a tensor, and of a totally antisymmetric tensor (resp. totally symmetric tensor)?
 
Damn I think I figured out my problem. I was going off Carroll's definition/discussion of (anti-) symmetry (Spacetime and Geometry) which implies that an exchange of a pair of indices in a totally antisymmetric tensor yields a sign change. This is fine I realize now, what is not fine is the following.

I was looking at \partial_{\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma}. I know that \partial_{\[\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma\]}=0 and I then INCORRECTLY assumed that \partial_{\alpha}F_{\beta\gamma} was totally symmetric which was leading me into errors...argh...noob mistake.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top