Expectation value of Normal ordered Stress-energy tensor

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

In Birrel and Davies ch4 they write:

\langle \psi|:T_{ab}:|\psi \rangle =\langle \psi|T_{ab}|\psi \rangle -\langle 0|T_{ab}|0 \rangle

this is for the usual Mink field modes and vac state. Why does normal ordering reduce to this expression, could anybody point me the way to deriving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In terms of free fields, the stress tensor is quadratic, so the difference with the normal-ordered expression is just a (divergent) c-number. This c-number is the only contribution to the vacuum expectation value, so you find the expression in question.

An analogous expression holds for any operator quadratic in the fields, as some playing around with annihilation and creation operators will reveal. You can already see how it works for a single harmonic oscillator if you consider the operator \hat{\mathcal{O}}= \alpha a^\dagger a + \beta a a^\dagger and expectation values in the |n\rangle state.
 
fzero said:
In terms of free fields, the stress tensor is quadratic, so the difference with the normal-ordered expression is just a (divergent) c-number. This c-number is the only contribution to the vacuum expectation value, so you find the expression in question.

An analogous expression holds for any operator quadratic in the fields, as some playing around with annihilation and creation operators will reveal. You can already see how it works for a single harmonic oscillator if you consider the operator \hat{\mathcal{O}}= \alpha a^\dagger a + \beta a a^\dagger and expectation values in the |n\rangle state.

Thanks for the reply.

Taking your harmonic oscillator example I think I see what you're getting at:

\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle =\langle n|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta a^{\dagger}a|n\rangle

then use aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a=1

to give:

\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle =\langle n|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta (aa^{\dagger}-1)|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\beta\langle n|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\beta

But actuallythe VEV \langle 0|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|0\rangle =\langle 0|\alpha a^{\dagger}a+\beta aa^{\dagger}|0\rangle=\beta\langle 0| aa^{\dagger}|0\rangle=\beta\langle 1|1\rangle =\beta

So we could have wrote

\langle n|:\hat{\mathcal{O}}:|n\rangle=\langle n|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|n\rangle-\langle 0|\hat{\mathcal{O}}|0\rangle

I just need to convince myself this works for an object like \langle \psi|:\phi^2:|\psi\rangle now...
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Back
Top