Medical Drawing and eyes/brain perception

AI Thread Summary
Artists often struggle to see mistakes in their work due to prolonged focus on specific details, such as the shape of a shadow, which can lead to overlooking broader issues like value consistency. Techniques like viewing artwork in a mirror or taking a break for a day can provide a fresh perspective, allowing artists to identify flaws that were previously unnoticed. This shift in focus helps to break the narrow mental engagement with specific elements, enabling a more holistic evaluation of the piece. Ultimately, stepping back or changing the viewpoint can enhance the overall coherence of the artwork by revealing inconsistencies that need to be addressed.
laprenti
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is something that most artists know about, when they draw or look at something for long periods of time they will not see the mistakes, but when they take a mirror and look at the reflection of the drawing they see all the faults. Also, leaving a drawing/painting for a day will let you see it in a new light. So, why does this happen and how does it work?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
laprenti said:
This is something that most artists know about, when they draw or look at something for long periods of time they will not see the mistakes, but when they take a mirror and look at the reflection of the drawing they see all the faults. Also, leaving a drawing/painting for a day will let you see it in a new light. So, why does this happen and how does it work?

Something like this: whenever you're drawing you are working on a specific thing at a specific place on the drawing, let's say the shape of a particular shadow. That narrow mental focus might come at the exclusion of paying complete attention to the value of the shadow. Leaving the drawing alone for a while, or, looking at it in a mirror, or upside down, breaks you out of looking at that shadow as a matter of shape alone, and you notice that the value is off.

That particular thing happens to me all the time. Finishing a drawing for me is often about adjusting all the values into a coherent whole. Other artists I know don't seem to get so confused about values and keep them consistent as they go along. They, however, might get fascinated by some other thing at the expense of something else, and the fresh look, where the original fascination is broken, allows them to see the flaws and take care of them.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top