What Are Fermions and Bosons in the Meson Quark Model?

Flavia
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1) What is mean by fermion with half integer spin and boson with integer spin

Is that fermion, 1/2,3/2...
boson, 1,2,3

2) Why meson don't have q = +1, S = -1 or q = -1, S = +1 in term of quark model
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes, the term "fermion" is referred to particle that have half integer spin (as you said 1/2, 3/2 and so on), while "boson" is referred to particle with integer spin. This have many consequences. First of all the wave function of N fermions must be antisymmetric under exchange of any two of this N fermions, while for bosons it has to be symmetric.

2) In term of quark model a "meson" is a particle composed by a quark and an anti-quark. There are six quarks in nature and their quantum numbers are (considering only charge and strangeness):

UP (u) Q=+2/3 S=0
DOWN (d) Q=-1/3 S=0
CHARM (c) Q=+2/3 S=0
STRANGE (s) Q=-1/3 S=-1
TOP (t) Q=+2/3 S=0
BOTTOM (b) Q=-1/3 S=0

The only way to have a meson with strangeness is to include a strange or anti-strange quark in its composition. So for example, if you want a meson with S=-1 you have to put a strange quark, but for the composition of mesons, the other element must be a anti-quark and as you can see from the list there is no way you can have a total charge Q=+1. The same reasoning is valid for the other combination S=+1 Q=-1.
 
Ok thanks! get it.

What is the differences between pion and muon?
 
A pion is a meson whereas a muon is part of a group of particles called leptons.
 
Also, in our current understanding a pion is a composed particle (is a meson) while the muon is known as an elementary particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top