Can You Solve This Challenging Exponential Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IndigoSwing4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging exponential equation: 5(2)^(3x) - 4 = 13. The original poster seeks assistance in solving it, particularly due to the complexity introduced by the exponent of 3x. Participants are encouraged to share their previous attempts and methods for solving exponential equations to identify where the confusion lies. The conversation emphasizes understanding the reasoning behind different solving techniques and their applicability to this specific problem. Overall, the thread aims to collaboratively find a solution to the equation.
IndigoSwing4
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
There is one problem that I can't seem to figure out how to do, and I was wondering if someone could help me. Problem: 5(2)^3x - 4 = 13 . Most exponential equations I can solve, but its the power of 3x that's messing me up.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As always, the first question is "What have you tried so far ?", so that we can see exactly where you need help. :)
 
And another question:How do u usually solve exponential equations and why do you think that the method wouldn't apply here...?

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Method for finding a complex series?
Replies
10
Views
2K
MHB How can I solve more complex exponential equations?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Using an array to solve a system of equations
Replies
7
Views
2K
MHB -s6.6 solve exponential eq 3^x-14\cdot 3^{-x}=5
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Exponential Equations solve 27^x=1/√3
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Rules for Finding the Base of a Exponential Function?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I How can I go from sine to cosine using exponential numbers?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Solve Int. Eq.: Exponential Growth Diff. Eq.
Replies
7
Views
3K
MHB Quadratic equations ( solving for zeros/roots) trickey
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Solving for an exponential equation using logarithms 16^{x}-5(4)^{x}-6=0
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top