Does the Electron's Magnetic Field Possess Higher-Order Poles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion examines whether the magnetic field of a single electron is merely an ideal dipole or if it possesses higher-order poles, such as a quadrupole moment. It is established that, within quantum mechanics, an electron's only degree of freedom aside from position and momentum is its spin, which generates a magnetic dipole field without higher-order moments. A hypothetical scenario is proposed where an electron could have a quadrupole spin, leading to a more complex energy level structure. The conversation also touches on the calculation of a permanent magnet's magnetic field, suggesting that while summing dipoles can provide an approximation, real magnets exhibit behaviors that contradict this model due to interactions that induce quadrupole moments. Ultimately, the analysis highlights the complexity of magnetic interactions beyond simple dipole approximations.
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
Is the magnetic field produced by a single electron an ideal dipole, or does it posses higher-order poles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Throughout quantum mechanics we assume that besides position and momentum, the only other degree of freedom an electron has is its spin--which as you said generates a magnetic dipole field. It possesses no "quadrupole spin" or higher-order degree of freedom.

Let's imagine the electron did have an additional degree of freedom akin to a spin, take the most basic case of a "quadrupole spin" of 1/2, such that it can have a quadrupole moment of "up" or "down" in addition to a dipole moment of "up" or "down." For shorthand let's write "up" and "down" as + and -. (Also assume that this particle is still a fermion--this is actually a nontrivial assumption.) Therefore the electron with normal spin 1/2 and "quadrupole spin" 1/2 would have one of the following spin states: |++>, |+->, |-+>, or |-->. If this were the case, then a hamiltonian that doesn't depend on the magnetic dipole or quadrupole moments would have quadruply degenerate energy levels rather than the usual double. For example, instead of a single S orbital permitting two electrons, it would permit four electrons when we include the quadrupole-1/2 degree of freedom, one each corresponding to |++>, |+->, |-+>, and |-->.
 
Last edited:
I see, thanks. So can you calculate the magnetic field of a permanent magnet by just summing up little dipoles and integrating over the volume of the magnet? (with the idealization that on average all the dipoles are aligned in the same direction)
 
Well, if you buy into the approximation that the permanent magnet is basically composed of a bunch of little parallel dipoles, then yes you could do that. Magnetic fields do obey the superposition principle. I'd guess that's a decent approximation for certain kinds of magnets. However, most real magnets behave in ways that would contradict that view. For example, take two ordinary bar magnets and position them side-to-side like this
|N| |N|
|S| |S|
(Unlike most of the things I talk about on PF, this is actually something you can do and you can't really figure out the real answer in your head). You'll notice that once you push them close enough together, the magnets snap together! This is because they induce quadrupole moments on one another--something that you wouldn't find by superposing a bunch of parallel dipole fields. Also, this would contradict the normal view of a magnet as a solenoid, since oppositely flowing currents repel one another.

One way to understand that experiment is by thinking of the iron (or neodymium, etc.) as composed of many different size regions (grains) each with different nonparallel dipole fields, which can reorient themselves under the influence of an outside magnetic field.
 
Last edited:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
672
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top