Should I Include the Blank in My Calibration Curve Graph?

AI Thread Summary
Including the blank (0.00 concentration, 0.00 absorbance) in the calibration curve graph is unnecessary. The calibration curve should focus on the relationship between concentration and absorbance for the samples. When the curve is constructed, it inherently accounts for the blank, as the absorbance values are adjusted accordingly. Therefore, it is sufficient to plot only the relevant concentrations and their corresponding absorbances. This approach simplifies the graph while maintaining accuracy in the results.
Rujano
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Hi. I have a table where there is an absorbance for a 0.00 concentration (blank). I now that I have to substract that value to to each of the other absorbances that I have, but my question is... Do I have to graph (concentration 0.00, absorbance 0.00) in the calibration curve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rujano said:
I now that I have to substract that value to to each of the other absorbances that I have

No need for that. Simply draw a curve If you read the result from the curve it is automatically adjusted for the blank.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top