Understanding Current using nqvA

  • Thread starter Thread starter Googl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
The equation for current, represented as Current = nqvA, relates the density of charge carriers (n), the charge of each carrier (q), their average speed (v), and the cross-sectional area of the conductor (A). Each variable contributes to understanding how current is quantified as the flow of charge per unit time. The discussion clarifies that multiplying these variables yields units of coulombs per second, equivalent to amperes. A cylindrical model is used to derive this relationship, emphasizing the number of charges passing a point per second. The conversation confirms the dimensional consistency of the equation, reinforcing its validity in electrical contexts.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I was wondering whether someone might help further understand the following equation for current. I mean get a good picture of how each valuable relates to each other and how they come to represent current.

Current = nqvA

Thanks. I know what each valuable represents but I can't seem to get a good picture how the equal represents current especially; Where time is taken into account since current is the rate of charge carriers/electrons.

I hope I have made my self clear.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops. No need I understand it now.

...but I would appreciate any replies just to make sure.
 
Googl said:
Hi all,

I was wondering whether someone might help further understand the following equation for current. I mean get a good picture of how each valuable relates to each other and how they come to represent current.

Current = nqvA

Thanks. I know what each valuable represents but I can't seem to get a good picture how the equal represents current especially; Where time is taken into account since current is the rate of charge carriers/electrons.

I hope I have made my self clear.

Thanks.
Could you please say what the variables in that equation all stand for? Where did you find that equation and what was the context? I have a problem with balancing it, dimensionally if the variables are what I assume they are.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Could you please say what the variables in that equation all stand for? Where did you find that equation and what was the context? I have a problem with balancing it, dimensionally if the variables are what I assume they are.

n = density of charge carriers (1/m^3)
q = charge of a charge carrier. (coulomb)
v = average speed of charge carriers. (m/s)
A = area of cross-section of wire m^2.

If you multiply them together you get coulomb/s = Ampere
 
Just checking we're reading from the same hymn sheet..
This is the 'well known' relationship in which the dimensions are the same each side (that should be reassuring). The way it's derived is to consider a cylinder with of area A and unit length, moving at average speed v. The number of charges in the cylinder will be n times the volume, which is nA (times one, the unit length) so the charge in it will be nqA (per unit length) and the number of charges passing a point in one second will be nqAv. That's I, the current.
OK?
 
Googl,

I remember it as:

n or p (holes or electrons) = charge carriers
q = charge per carrier --±1.6E-19 C/(electron or hole)
v = velocity
A = area

So n*q*v*A or p*q*v*A equals current

Sometimes J (current density) is used. J = I/A = q*(p or n)*v.

EDIT: Sorry, I should have written in the first line, "concentration of n or p (holes or electrons) = charge carriers/m^3 .

Ratch
 
Last edited:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top