Is There a Way to Reverse Substitution in Finding Zeroes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pierce15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding intersections between the complex functions f(z)=e^z and g(z)=z, leading to the equation e^z=z. A substitution reveals that z=ln(z), allowing the equation to be rewritten as e^z=ln(z). The user is puzzled about reversing this substitution to find zeroes of the function i(z)=e^z-ln(z) back to h(z)=e^z-z. The conversation highlights the connection to the Lambert W function and emphasizes that there is no real number solution for the original equation e^z=z. The user ultimately seeks clarity on the concept of reverse substitution in this context.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hi guys... I'm probably missing something pretty basic here but I can't seem to figure this out. I was working on a problem recently: for the complex functions f(z)=ez and g(z)=z, find their intersections. This post is not about the problem, it is about something I noticed while tackling it (incorrectly).

Anyways, here's what I noticed: If you set these functions equal to each other, you get

ez=z

So, naturally:

z=ln(z)

From here I saw that a basic substitution was applicable, so the equation can be rewritten:

ez=ln(z)

Basically, what I have shown is that the function h(z)=ez-z has the same zeroes as the function i(z)=ez-ln(z). Now here's what's troubling me: what if the original problem that I gave you was to find the zeroes of i(z)? Originally, we obtained i(z) from h(z) by using a substitution, but is there some way that we can go in reverse from i(z) to h(z) using a "reverse substitution"? I'm sorry if this is rather unclear. Is there anything fundamental that I am missing?

Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.

Note that we are working with complex functions. By the way, I did find an answer to this problem, right now I am just thinking about reversing the substitution
 
pwsnafu said:
This is related to the Lambert W function.

pwnsnafu, like I said, I already solved the equation using the labert w function. Please read my first post carefully.
 
I guess this is kind of unclear. Here is the problem stated more clearly:

Prove that the system of f(z)=ez and g(z)=ln(z) has the same solutions as the system of f(z)=ez and h(z)=z
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top