Variation of the metric tensor determinant

InsertName
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not homework but more like self-study - thought I'd post it here anyway.

I'm taking the variation of the determinant of the metric tensor:

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu</sub><sub>\nu</sub>]).


Homework Equations



The answer is

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>]) =det[g\mu\nu] g\mu\nu \deltag\mu\nu

Here, g\mu\nu is the metric tensor, [g\mu\nu] is the matrix of the components of the metric tensor, and \delta is a variation.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>])
=det[g\mu\nu] tr([g\mu\nu]-1\delta([g\mu\nu]))

The problem, in my view, is the trace. I cannot see how to remove it.

Also, if someone could kindly describe how to tidy the LaTeX up, I will do that.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't use the tags in latex. Instead, write g_{\mu \nu}, g^{\mu \nu} etc.

InsertName said:
I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(\det[g_{\mu\nu}]) = \det[g_{\mu\nu}] \mathrm{Tr}([g_{\mu\nu}^{-1}\delta([g_ {\mu\nu}]))

This is a little bit tricky, as you don't really keep track of how your matrices are multiplied together. If you do it with more care, you should find something like
\delta \det(g) = \det(g) \mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ),
with (g \cdot \delta(g))_{\mu \nu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta ({g^\lambda}_\nu)
Now it's easy to see what the trace is:
\mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ) = (g \cdot {\delta(g))_\mu}^{\mu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta (g^{\lambda \mu})
 
use
g=(1/4!)εαβγδεμvρσgαμgβvgγρgδσ
ggαμαβγδεμvρσgβvgγρgδσ
now when you apply δ on g you can use the second of the above to get whole result.(i am not going to do it in full,because of the requirement of homework section)
 
Hmm,may be tough.
so use Tr (ln M)=ln(det M)
variation of it yields,
Tr(M-1 δM)=(1/det M)δ(det M)
JUST PUT M=gμv
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top