Variation of the metric tensor determinant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The variation of the determinant of the metric tensor is expressed as \delta(\det[g_{\mu\nu}]) = \det[g_{\mu\nu}] \mathrm{Tr}(g_{\mu\nu}^{-1}\delta(g_{\mu\nu})). This formulation highlights the relationship between the determinant and the trace of the inverse metric tensor multiplied by its variation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful matrix multiplication to derive the correct expression, ultimately leading to \delta \det(g) = \det(g) \mathrm{Tr}(g \cdot \delta(g)). Participants also noted the need for proper LaTeX formatting for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric tensors in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and determinants
  • Knowledge of variations in calculus of variations
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical typesetting
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Learn about the calculus of variations and its applications
  • Explore matrix calculus, particularly in the context of determinants
  • Practice LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying general relativity or differential geometry who are interested in the properties of metric tensors and their variations.

InsertName
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not homework but more like self-study - thought I'd post it here anyway.

I'm taking the variation of the determinant of the metric tensor:

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu</sub><sub>\nu</sub>]).


Homework Equations



The answer is

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>]) =det[g\mu\nu] g\mu\nu \deltag\mu\nu

Here, g\mu\nu is the metric tensor, [g\mu\nu] is the matrix of the components of the metric tensor, and \delta is a variation.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>])
=det[g\mu\nu] tr([g\mu\nu]-1\delta([g\mu\nu]))

The problem, in my view, is the trace. I cannot see how to remove it.

Also, if someone could kindly describe how to tidy the LaTeX up, I will do that.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't use the tags in latex. Instead, write g_{\mu \nu}, g^{\mu \nu} etc.

InsertName said:
I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(\det[g_{\mu\nu}]) = \det[g_{\mu\nu}] \mathrm{Tr}([g_{\mu\nu}^{-1}\delta([g_ {\mu\nu}]))

This is a little bit tricky, as you don't really keep track of how your matrices are multiplied together. If you do it with more care, you should find something like
\delta \det(g) = \det(g) \mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ),
with (g \cdot \delta(g))_{\mu \nu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta ({g^\lambda}_\nu)
Now it's easy to see what the trace is:
\mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ) = (g \cdot {\delta(g))_\mu}^{\mu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta (g^{\lambda \mu})
 
use
g=(1/4!)εαβγδεμvρσgαμgβvgγρgδσ
ggαμαβγδεμvρσgβvgγρgδσ
now when you apply δ on g you can use the second of the above to get whole result.(i am not going to do it in full,because of the requirement of homework section)
 
Hmm,may be tough.
so use Tr (ln M)=ln(det M)
variation of it yields,
Tr(M-1 δM)=(1/det M)δ(det M)
JUST PUT M=gμv
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K