Variation of the metric tensor determinant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the variation of the determinant of the metric tensor, specifically the expression \(\delta(\det[g_{\mu\nu}])\). Participants are exploring the mathematical implications and manipulations of this expression within the context of differential geometry and tensor calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the variation of the determinant of the metric tensor and are discussing the role of the trace in their calculations. Some are questioning how to simplify or manipulate the trace term effectively.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and alternative approaches. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several lines of reasoning are being explored, including the use of matrix properties and the relationship between the trace and the determinant.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the challenge of adhering to homework guidelines while discussing self-study topics. There are also mentions of formatting issues with LaTeX that some participants are trying to address.

InsertName
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not homework but more like self-study - thought I'd post it here anyway.

I'm taking the variation of the determinant of the metric tensor:

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu</sub><sub>\nu</sub>]).


Homework Equations



The answer is

\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>]) =det[g\mu\nu] g\mu\nu \deltag\mu\nu

Here, g\mu\nu is the metric tensor, [g\mu\nu] is the matrix of the components of the metric tensor, and \delta is a variation.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(det[g<sub>\mu\nu</sub>])
=det[g\mu\nu] tr([g\mu\nu]-1\delta([g\mu\nu]))

The problem, in my view, is the trace. I cannot see how to remove it.

Also, if someone could kindly describe how to tidy the LaTeX up, I will do that.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't use the tags in latex. Instead, write g_{\mu \nu}, g^{\mu \nu} etc.

InsertName said:
I have managed to get close to the answer, I hope, with
\delta(\det[g_{\mu\nu}]) = \det[g_{\mu\nu}] \mathrm{Tr}([g_{\mu\nu}^{-1}\delta([g_ {\mu\nu}]))

This is a little bit tricky, as you don't really keep track of how your matrices are multiplied together. If you do it with more care, you should find something like
\delta \det(g) = \det(g) \mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ),
with (g \cdot \delta(g))_{\mu \nu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta ({g^\lambda}_\nu)
Now it's easy to see what the trace is:
\mathrm{Tr}( g \cdot \delta(g) ) = (g \cdot {\delta(g))_\mu}^{\mu} = g_{\mu \lambda} \delta (g^{\lambda \mu})
 
use
g=(1/4!)εαβγδεμvρσgαμgβvgγρgδσ
ggαμαβγδεμvρσgβvgγρgδσ
now when you apply δ on g you can use the second of the above to get whole result.(i am not going to do it in full,because of the requirement of homework section)
 
Hmm,may be tough.
so use Tr (ln M)=ln(det M)
variation of it yields,
Tr(M-1 δM)=(1/det M)δ(det M)
JUST PUT M=gμv
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
810
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K