Question about gravity on the large scale.

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Scale
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of Olbers' paradox on gravity, considering an infinite number of evenly distributed planets of uniform mass. It highlights that while gravitational pull decreases with distance (1/r^2), the number of planets increases with the square of the distance (r^2), suggesting a potential infinite gravitational pull that might cancel out due to symmetry. The conversation references Gauss's law and questions how to determine a center in such a scenario, given the uniformity of the observable universe. It also addresses the concept of measuring motion relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) through temperature variations and dipole moments. Ultimately, the discussion raises intriguing questions about gravitational effects in an infinite universe and our position within it.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I was thinking about olbers paradox and how I could apply it to gravity.
We assume that their are an infinite amount of planets and that they are all about
the same mass or we will just pick a minimum mass. And we assume they are evenly distributed. So the gravitational field falls off as 1/r^2 but the amount of planets grows
as r^2. So If there were an infinite amount of planets or stars or whatever, we would experience an infinite pull, but this would be in all directions so it might cancel.
i guess this is similar to gauss's law. But how would we know where the center is or how would we balance these infinities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We are all in the center of our observable universe with a finite age - and as space looks nearly the same in all directions (if you are at rest with respect to the CMB), you don't get a significant attraction. There are some attracting things if you have a closer look.
 
How would you know you at rest compared to CMB
Would you tell by measuring the frequency.
 
You measure the temperature (which is related to the total intensity) and look for a dipole moment: If the CMB is hotter in direction X and colder at the opposite side, you are moving towards X (relative to the CMB).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top