Schools Need guidance as to what to do next, high school student

AI Thread Summary
A grade 12 student aspiring to become a physicist is seeking guidance on their academic path after extensive self-study in physics and mathematics. They have completed high school physics, calculus, and various university-level texts, including Griffith's Electrodynamics and Boas' Methods in Physical Sciences. Despite their progress, they express confusion about the next steps, particularly in rigorous mathematics, mentioning challenges with vector calculus and Lebesgue theory. They inquire about suitable math books and whether to continue self-study or focus on university curriculum. A response suggests that gaining research experience at a university would be beneficial, emphasizing the importance of not just reading but also solving problems to truly master the material. The student acknowledges their current understanding and readiness to deepen their knowledge, while also contemplating the balance between self-study and formal education. Additionally, a comment highlights the importance of strong English skills in scientific communication.
bigerst
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hello I am a grade 12 student looking to be a physicist. the school course is hardly satisfactory so I did a hell of a lot of self study, I'm wondering in which direction i should head next.
I did high school physics in grade 9, calculus in grade 10, first yr uni physics g11, and intro to real analysis, i finished 1/2 of john taylor's classical mechanics, now almost done griffith's electrodynamics, and i read most of Boas' methods in physical sciences.
So now I am just confused, in which direction should i head (excuse me for the vague question, please read on) i also enjoy math, especially rigorous math (and phycists tend to be very sloppy) so i read trench's introduction to real analysis, and is reading pugh's real analysis, however i seeem to have hard time with the vector calculus presented in such abstract manner, and lesbeguese theory is a hell of a theory to me. so I am just wondering, are there suitable math books (the ones that do legitimate proofs instead of shuffling it under the carpet) suitable for my current level? intro to complex analysis maybe? tensor analysis? ( i had a look at rudin's book and it gives me nightmares) or more rigours books on mathematical physics? ( i really like calculus and analysis, maybe i should wait to mature a bit before returning to Pugh?) also heading onto university would it still help for me to read so much on my own time or focus more on the curriculum? I am looking to be a theoretical/ mathematical phyicist.
thanks

Bigerst
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you really have mastered undergrad physics material (griffiths, boas, etc) then what you are lacking is research. You should head to your nearest university and find a research group to volunteer with. Its not unheard of for advanced high school students to do research at a university.

However, did you just read the books or did you actually do work? If you just read through them without doing problems I would suggest you go back and try some problems and try to reproduce some of the theorem's without looking at the book. Blazing through books is easy. Working out the ideas takes a long time. There is a reason that most people take 4 years to study the material you have already read.
 
Last edited:
thanks for the reply
that's pretty much what I am facing right now, i wouldn't say i mastered all of the content for i am well aware it is going to take a year or so for those material to sink in and become part of my arsenal, for i can see a gap between myself and really recreating and advancing what i have learned. however i wouldn't say the opposite either, for i can do most of the problems in grffiths (ok i admit, i read it 5 times) and Boas (this is slightly easier). so right now I am in a kind of awkward situation, I'm waiting for my physics maturity to catch up, I am just uncertain what to do at this stage.

Thanks

bigerst
 
bigerst said:
I'm wondering in which direction i should head next

You should work on your English. Nobody has ever run into trouble in science because their English was too good.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top