Understanding the Derivation of the Dirac Equation in Cosmology

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the Dirac equation in the context of cosmology, specifically addressing the form that incorporates the scale factor of the universe. Key points include confusion about the absence of a \sqrt{-g} term and the role of the vierbein in the matter action. Participants clarify that the covariant derivative involves the spin connection and how it relates to the gamma matrices, emphasizing the need for basis vectors in curved spacetimes. Additionally, there is a discussion about the notation of the covariant derivative and its action on spinors. Overall, the conversation seeks to clarify the mathematical framework necessary for understanding spinors in cosmological settings.
pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi i am trying to derive the Dirac equation of the form:
[i\gamma^0 \partial_0 + i\frac{1}{a(t)}\gamma.\nabla +i\frac{3}{2}(\frac{\dot{a}}{a})\gamma^0 - (m+h\phi)]\psi where a is the scale factor for expnasion of the universe.


I understand that the matter action is S=\int d^{4}x e [\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi - V(\phi) + i \bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}^{\mu}\vec{D}_{\mu}\psi -(m+h\phi)\bar{\psi}\psi)] but i don't understand firstly why there is a vierbein and not a \sqrt{-g} term.

I don't really understand why this is the case D_{\mu}=\frac{1}{4}\bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}^{\mu} \gamma_{\alpha \beta}\omega^{\alpha \beta}_{\mu} and why the arrow above the D is gone.

And lastly I don't understand why \bar{\gamma}^{i}=\frac{1}{a(t)}\gamma^{i}

I understand that one needs to vary the action and i can do that bit but I don't understand some of these conversions, thx. I would appareciate any help that anyone can offer in tis challenge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To deal with spinors in curved spacetimes (or even just curvilinear coordinates) you need to use a set of basis vectors. This is because the gamma matrices that obey {γμ, γν} = 2gμν aren't constant, so we use instead matrices referred to a basis, in which {γa, γb} = 2ηab.

The covariant derivative is Dμ = ∂μ - (1/4)σabωabμ where σab is the usual Dirac matrix, and ωabμ are the Ricci rotation coefficients associated with the vierbein.

I think the only reason there's an arrow over the D is to remind us that it acts on the spinor to its right.
 
yeah thanks, i have a method to work on now.
I know that one can relate the spin connection to the gamma matrices by: \Gamma_{\mu} to \gamma by [\Gamma_{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}] but is this simply a standard commutator relationship or is it something more because wouldn't \Gamma_{1}\gamma^{1} - \gamma^{1}\Gamma_{1} =0 for example?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K