Understanding the Derivation of the Dirac Equation in Cosmology

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Dirac equation in cosmology, specifically the form [iγ00 + i(1/a(t))γ·∇ + i(3/2)(ḧa/a)γ0 - (m+hφ)]ψ. Key components include the matter action S = ∫ d4x e [½∂μφ∂μφ - V(φ) + i ̄ψ̄γμμψ - (m+hφ)̄ψψ], and the use of vierbein instead of a √(-g) term. The discussion also clarifies the covariant derivative Dμ = ∂μ - (1/4)σabωabμ, emphasizing the necessity of basis vectors for handling gamma matrices in curved spacetimes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with cosmological concepts, particularly the scale factor a(t).
  • Knowledge of vierbein formalism and its role in general relativity.
  • Proficiency in tensor calculus and the manipulation of gamma matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime using vierbein formalism.
  • Learn about the role of the spin connection and Ricci rotation coefficients in general relativity.
  • Explore the relationship between gamma matrices and the spin connection in detail.
  • Investigate the implications of varying the action in the context of quantum field theory in curved spacetime.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, theoretical physicists, and graduate students specializing in quantum field theory, general relativity, and cosmology who are interested in the mathematical foundations of the Dirac equation in expanding universes.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi i am trying to derive the Dirac equation of the form:
[i\gamma^0 \partial_0 + i\frac{1}{a(t)}\gamma.\nabla +i\frac{3}{2}(\frac{\dot{a}}{a})\gamma^0 - (m+h\phi)]\psi where a is the scale factor for expnasion of the universe.


I understand that the matter action is S=\int d^{4}x e [\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi - V(\phi) + i \bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}^{\mu}\vec{D}_{\mu}\psi -(m+h\phi)\bar{\psi}\psi)] but i don't understand firstly why there is a vierbein and not a \sqrt{-g} term.

I don't really understand why this is the case D_{\mu}=\frac{1}{4}\bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}^{\mu} \gamma_{\alpha \beta}\omega^{\alpha \beta}_{\mu} and why the arrow above the D is gone.

And lastly I don't understand why \bar{\gamma}^{i}=\frac{1}{a(t)}\gamma^{i}

I understand that one needs to vary the action and i can do that bit but I don't understand some of these conversions, thx. I would appareciate any help that anyone can offer in tis challenge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To deal with spinors in curved spacetimes (or even just curvilinear coordinates) you need to use a set of basis vectors. This is because the gamma matrices that obey {γμ, γν} = 2gμν aren't constant, so we use instead matrices referred to a basis, in which {γa, γb} = 2ηab.

The covariant derivative is Dμ = ∂μ - (1/4)σabωabμ where σab is the usual Dirac matrix, and ωabμ are the Ricci rotation coefficients associated with the vierbein.

I think the only reason there's an arrow over the D is to remind us that it acts on the spinor to its right.
 
yeah thanks, i have a method to work on now.
I know that one can relate the spin connection to the gamma matrices by: \Gamma_{\mu} to \gamma by [\Gamma_{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}] but is this simply a standard commutator relationship or is it something more because wouldn't \Gamma_{1}\gamma^{1} - \gamma^{1}\Gamma_{1} =0 for example?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K