How Do Cosmic Rays Affect the Integrity of Unshielded Spacecraft?

AI Thread Summary
Cosmic rays can severely impact unshielded spacecraft by inducing spallation reactions, where high-energy particles knock out nucleons from target nuclei, altering the material's integrity. This radiation can disrupt electronics and create secondary particle cascades, potentially compromising the hull and engine. NASA has conducted extensive research on the effects of cosmic and solar protons on spacecraft materials to determine effective shielding strategies. Continuous exposure to cosmic rays can change the microstructure of materials, affecting their chemical properties. Understanding these effects is crucial for ensuring the safety and functionality of spacecraft in high-radiation environments.
Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
294
Reaction score
37
Hi all,

I think this question goes best in this section, because I think the answer is something a nuclear or particle scientist could answer.

In space, what would happen to a ship that did not have proper shielding from cosmic rays? (NOT the astronauts themselves; there is plenty of material on cosmic rays impacting them). I know the electronics would go out, and there would be secondary effects (cascades of particles). What would happen to the hull of the ship? What would happen to an engine if cosmic rays flooded into it? Would the ship melt away? Would there be flashes of ship like on a microwave?

I know it depends on the materials, but I couldn't find even a single website on this subject. If you know how any material would transform macroscopically at all when constantly exposed to high energy particles, that would be great.

A website or book with more info would help, too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertgauss said:
Hi all,

I think this question goes best in this section, because I think the answer is something a nuclear or particle scientist could answer.

In space, what would happen to a ship that did not have proper shielding from cosmic rays? (NOT the astronauts themselves; there is plenty of material on cosmic rays impacting them). I know the electronics would go out, and there would be secondary effects (cascades of particles). What would happen to the hull of the ship? What would happen to an engine if cosmic rays flooded into it? Would the ship melt away? Would there be flashes of ship like on a microwave?

I know it depends on the materials, but I couldn't find even a single website on this subject. If you know how any material would transform macroscopically at all when constantly exposed to high energy particles, that would be great.

A website or book with more info would help, too.

NASA has done extensive studies on the interaction of solar and cosmic protons, alpha particles and heavier nuclei on spacecraft structural materials. High energy particle above a few MeV induce spallation reactions in which the incident particles knocks out nucleons from the target nuclei, e.g., (p,d) or (p,α) reaction. NASA's interest is understanding the nature of primary and secondary particle radiation fields in order to determine the best shielding for a given mission, particularly where astronauts are involved.

Nuclear spallation by solar proton events and cosmic rays in the eROSITA and ATHENA focal plane configurations
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012SPIE.8443E..2JP

The International Space Station (ISS) with an altitude of 370 ± 40 km (230 ± 25 mi) is constantly bombarded by solar and cosmic particles (mostly protons), but not as harshly as geosynchronous/geostationary satellites at 35,780 km (22,234 mi), give or take.

Besides changing the nuclei of atoms (thus altering the chemistry slightly), the radiation changes the microstructure of structural materials.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
2
Replies
74
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top