Is Categorizing Mathematics into 10 Levels Effective?

AI Thread Summary
Categorizing mathematics into ten distinct levels is seen as an artificial division by some, as many mathematical concepts are interconnected. While traditional education often separates topics like algebra, linear algebra, and analysis, the reality is that advanced mathematics frequently overlaps these categories. For instance, graph theory employs advanced analysis techniques, and set theory has influenced non-standard analysis. The discussion suggests that a more integrated approach may better reflect the relationships within mathematical disciplines. Overall, the effectiveness of such categorization is questioned due to the inherent connections in mathematics.
Deicider
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I saw somewhere that mathematics can be divided into 10 sections, i quote:

"1-Arithmetic
2-Basic Logic and Set Theory: proof techniques and reasoning, Sets,
operations on sets, mappings, binary relations (you'll need that
if you expect to go anywhere beyond arithmetic..)
3-Combinatorics and Elementary Number Theory
4-Basic Abstract Algebra: groups, rings, fields
5-Linear Algebra: Linear spaces, subspaces, linear mappings, matrices, polynomials
6-Affine and Euclidian Geometry
7-Basic Point-Set Topology
8-Analysis
9-More Linear Algebra
10-More Abstract Algebra"

How much of this is true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To be honest, I see no reason to make this categorization...

Of course, if you learn math e.g. at a university, you will have different subjects, like algebra, linear algebra, analysis, etc. However, after learning enough, you will see, that everything is connected with almost everything in mathematics. Graph theorists use extereme advanced analysis techniques, analysists often use algebraic tools, and set theorists created non-standard analysis (where the "infinitesimal" quantity is defined in a precise sense!) etc, so these categories are rather artificial in my opinon.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top