Boundedness of Continuous Function

gajohnson
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be a real, uniformly continuous function on the bounded set E in R^1. Prove that f is bounded on E. Show that the conclusion is false if boundedness of E is omitted from the hypothesis.

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so the second part is easy. We simply let E=R^1 and f(x)=x.

For the first part, I feel like there is a proof-by-contradiction to be had, but I can't quite find it. Any help in the right direction (including telling me that I'm barking up the wrong tree), would be helpful.

Here's what I have so far (pretty much just the definitions, currently searching for where to create the contradiction):

Assume f is unbounded on E. Then, for all M>0, there exists some {x}\in{E} s.t. \left|f(x)\right|>M.
Now, because E is bounded, there exists {x}\in{R^1} and r>0 s.t. d(x,s)<r for all {s}\in{E}

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##E## is bounded, then it is contained in some compact set ##K##. Compact sets allow you to reduce any open cover to a finite subcover. What would be a good open cover to use here?
 
gajohnson said:

Homework Statement



Let f be a real, uniformly continuous function on the bounded set E in R^1. Prove that f is bounded on E. Show that the conclusion is false if boundedness of E is omitted from the hypothesis.

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so the second part is easy. We simply let E=R^1 and f(x)=x.

For the first part, I feel like there is a proof-by-contradiction to be had, but I can't quite find it. Any help in the right direction (including telling me that I'm barking up the wrong tree), would be helpful.

Here's what I have so far (pretty much just the definitions, currently searching for where to create the contradiction):

Assume f is unbounded on E. Then, for all M>0, there exists some {x}\in{E} s.t. \left|f(x)\right|>M.
Now, because E is bounded, there exists {x}\in{R^1} and r>0 s.t. d(x,s)<r for all {s}\in{E}

Thanks!

You haven't used uniform continuity! E contained in the interval [s-r,s+r]. State the definition of uniform continuity and split the interval into a lot of parts.
 
And you do need to use uniform continuity. The function f(x)= 1/x is continuous on (0, 1) but not bounded.

(I point this out because my first thought was that continuity was sufficient. I was trying to remember "a function continuous on a closed and bounded set is bounded on that set" and momentarily forgot that E is not necessarily closed.)
 
Dick said:
You haven't used uniform continuity! E contained in the interval [s-r,s+r]. State the definition of uniform continuity and split the interval into a lot of parts.

Ah, got it! Of course. It's pretty simple from there. Thanks everyone!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top