Can Two Electrons in an Atom Share the Same Quantum Numbers?

i know it all
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was told that the pauli exclusion principle states that no two electrons in an atom can have the same quantum numbers is it ture need answers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i know it all said:
is it true?

yes.
 
Are you asking if that that's what the pauli exclusion principle states?

Or if the exclusion principle is right?

Have you tried google yet?
 
If you know a bit about quantum then this should be nice way of explaining things:
Given a wavefuntion W(x,y) of two identical particles in states x and y. we say that the particles are bosons if the wavefunction is symmetric under particle exchange i.e. W(x,y) = W(y,x), and they are fermions if the wavefunction is anti-symmetric under particle exchange i.e. W(x,y) = -W(y,x)

Now, a simple consequence for Fermions is that if the two particles are in the same state, then we have W(x,x) = -W(x,x) = 0, hence the probability of two fermions being in the same state is zero. This is the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

Oh, and electrons are fermions, hence no two electrons can be in the same state and therefore no two electrons in an atom can have the same quantum number. As an example, in the Helium Atom, you have two electrons and whilst they may be in the same "shell", one will be in a spin up state and one will be in a spin down state. When you move on to Lithium, the third electron cannot be in the same state as the first two and hence occupies a new shell
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top