Dirac Equation in (-,++++) Notation

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Just to clarify in the dirac equation (i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} -m)\psi=0

Is it equal to (-i\gamma^{0}\partial_{0}+i\gamma^{i}\partial_{i} -m)\psi=0 in (-,++++) notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, for a repeated index with one index up and one index down, just sum:

γμμ = γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33

You only need to use the Minkowski metric if both indices are up, or both indices down:

ημνγμν = - γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33

or ημνγμν = - γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top