What Does the Floor Function Identity Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddybob123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Identity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the floor function identity and its components, particularly the notation z mod 1. The floor function is created from a staircase function derived from an infinite summation, with the unit step function being a key element. The term z mod 1 indicates the fractional part of z, representing the element in the interval [0,1) that satisfies z - x being an integer. Participants also inquire about systematic formulas relating any positive real number r to its floor value, noting that the difference between r and its floor is the fractional part. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the mathematical implications of these concepts.
eddybob123
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
eddybob123 said:
Hi all, I found this rather interesting formula online and I was wondering what it means. Could someone explain it to me? All help is appreciated:
http://functions.wolfram.com/IntegerFunctions/Floor/16/03/0001/

the \theta function is the unit step function, so they are creating a staircase function out of the steps (the infinite summation), and that becomes the floor function.
 
But what does the z mod 1 mean? I've never seen people use 1 as a modular base before?
 
eddybob123 said:
But what does the z mod 1 mean? I've never seen people use 1 as a modular base before?

The notation ##z## mod 1 means that you take the element ##x\in [0,1)## such that ##z-x\in \mathbb{Z}##.

If you wish, you can put an equivalence relation ##x\sim y~\Leftrightarrow ~x-y\in \mathbb{Z}## on ##\mathbb{R}##. We can then look at equivalence classes. It won't be the exact same thing as what I said in my first sentence though.
 
Are there any formulas that compare any positive real number r with floor[r]? I know that their difference is the fractional part of r, which is {r}, but I mean are there any formulas where you can obtain these values systematically?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top