Dynamics of a particle moving in a straight line

AI Thread Summary
Two particles, P and Q, with masses 2m and m respectively, are connected by a string over a pulley and released from rest at a height of 2m. When particle P hits the ground, particle Q reaches a height of 4m above the ground. Q then experiences upward acceleration followed by downward acceleration due to tension, leading to additional travel. The calculations indicate that Q travels a total of 2.66m above its starting position, resulting in a maximum height of 4.66m above ground. The discussion confirms the correctness of this analysis.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

Sorry if I have posted in the wrong place. I am not to familiar with the forum titles and new setting. I have an argument and this is not homework.

Suppose two particles P and Q of masses 2m and m respectivily are attached to the ends of a light inextensible string which passes over a smooth fixed pulley. They both hang at a distance of 2m above the horizontal ground. The system is released from rest.

Given that particle Q does not reach the pulley, Find the greatest height that Q reaches above the ground.

I know how to find final velocities, decelerations etc through the system for each particle. I have got a total distance of 4.66m, however the answer is 2.66 which I am thinking is wrong.

Since both particles hung 2m above ground Q will be at a distance of 4m as soon as P hits the ground and then continue a small distance of 0.665m during the deceleration span due to the tension in the string.

Am I right.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer sounds correct to me.

As you point out, particle P hits the ground when particle Q is 2 meters above its starting position. That puts Q 4 meters above ground.

At that point Q had been accelerating through 2 meters with an upward acceleration of 1/3 gravity. It continued upward with a downward acceleration of 1 gravity. Equating the work done on particle Q in the two phases and solving, you get 2/3 of a meter of additional travel for a total of 2.66 meters travel ending 4.66 meters above ground.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top