Calculating Relativity with Different Speeds: Vacuum or Medium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter User11037
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
User11037
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is probably a silly question but I can't seem to find the answer anywhere:

are the effects of relativity calculated with reference to the speed of light in a vacuum or the speed of light in the medium in which you are traveling? For instance, if traveling in water, would the Lorentz factor be calculated based on c ≈ 3e8 or c ≈ 2.2 e8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Speed of light in a vacuum. The physics of light traveling through a medium are very different; the light is being continuously scattered, absorbed, re-emitted by the atoms of the medium. You could imagine the light being absorbed by an atom, then being re-emitted after a delay, traveling at c through the vacuum between atoms, then being absorbed and delayed again.

It's possible for a particle to travel through a medium at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium; but not faster than c.

In fact, it would be more accurate to say that "c is the speed of a massless particle in a vacuum and light, being massless, travels at that speed in a vacuum" than "c is the speed of light". We don't, but that's for historical reasons - when relativity was being developed we didn't know about the other things that propagate with speed c.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.
 
HallsofIvy said:
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.

How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, and I guess mass/energy equivalence since the electron has a mass.

Is it better said as An electron can move faster than a photon through a medium under xyz conditions; both speeds are less than c*.

*speed of light in a vacuum
 
Well, yes, the whole point is that the speed of light in water is less than the speed of light in vacuum. The whole point is that relativity uses the speed of light in vacuum and an electron can move faster than the speed of light in water. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
 
nitsuj said:
How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, ...

It seems to me that Causality is related to the maximum signal speed.
The "speed of light in vacuum" happens to equal that maximum signal speed.

The speed of light and of other particles in a medium is more about their interactions with the medium... with causality only playing a role in setting an upper speed limit.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
500
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top