Calculating Relativity with Different Speeds: Vacuum or Medium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter User11037
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
User11037
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is probably a silly question but I can't seem to find the answer anywhere:

are the effects of relativity calculated with reference to the speed of light in a vacuum or the speed of light in the medium in which you are traveling? For instance, if traveling in water, would the Lorentz factor be calculated based on c ≈ 3e8 or c ≈ 2.2 e8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Speed of light in a vacuum. The physics of light traveling through a medium are very different; the light is being continuously scattered, absorbed, re-emitted by the atoms of the medium. You could imagine the light being absorbed by an atom, then being re-emitted after a delay, traveling at c through the vacuum between atoms, then being absorbed and delayed again.

It's possible for a particle to travel through a medium at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium; but not faster than c.

In fact, it would be more accurate to say that "c is the speed of a massless particle in a vacuum and light, being massless, travels at that speed in a vacuum" than "c is the speed of light". We don't, but that's for historical reasons - when relativity was being developed we didn't know about the other things that propagate with speed c.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.
 
HallsofIvy said:
As a result of the relativistic properties being based on the speed of light in vacuum, while it is not possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in vacuum, it is possible for an electron to move faster than the speed of light in water. That has been observed in water cooled nuclear reactors.

How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, and I guess mass/energy equivalence since the electron has a mass.

Is it better said as An electron can move faster than a photon through a medium under xyz conditions; both speeds are less than c*.

*speed of light in a vacuum
 
Well, yes, the whole point is that the speed of light in water is less than the speed of light in vacuum. The whole point is that relativity uses the speed of light in vacuum and an electron can move faster than the speed of light in water. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
 
nitsuj said:
How is that possible? Seems to violate causality, ...

It seems to me that Causality is related to the maximum signal speed.
The "speed of light in vacuum" happens to equal that maximum signal speed.

The speed of light and of other particles in a medium is more about their interactions with the medium... with causality only playing a role in setting an upper speed limit.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top