What does the slope of a velocity vs time squared graph represent?

Thread starter TheThinkerToo
Start date Aug 11, 2013
Tags

Graph Slope Time Velocity

AI Thread Summary

The slope of a velocity vs. time squared graph represents the relationship between velocity and the square of time, indicating how velocity changes with time. It is suggested that the slope of the distance vs. time squared graph is half of the acceleration, highlighting a connection between these variables. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships in kinematics. Clarification on how these slopes relate to acceleration and the rate of change of acceleration is sought. Overall, the thread explores the mathematical implications of these graphs in physics.

Aug 11, 2013

TheThinkerToo

Basing on the units, the velocity vs time is equal to acceleration. What about the velocity vs time squared and distance vs time squared graph?

Is the slope of the distance vs time squared graph one half of the acceleration? If it does, please explain.. :)

Last edited: Aug 11, 2013

Physics news on Phys.org

Aug 11, 2013

PhysicoRaj

Gold Member

Rate of change of acceleration and acceleration respectively.

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

View full post »