Quick question on Probability Current

Seydlitz
Messages
262
Reaction score
4
Here's the probability current equation as seen in Griffith's book.

j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}\left(\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial x}- (\frac{\partial \Psi^* }{\partial x})\Psi \right)

Does the second right term instruct us to take the derivative of the wave function complex conjugate? Or for that matter $$\Psi^*$$ this refers to the complex conjugate right?

Secondly, what math topics are included in Schrodinger's equation? Is it only differential calculus or does it also include complex variable calculus?

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since t \in \mathbb{R}, of course
\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}=\left (\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} \right )^*.
In principle the Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation of real arguments for a complex-valued function.

Of course, as always, the use of complex analysis is of great advantage to find solutions. The masters of this approach were Sommerfeld and Pauli. You can read about this in Pauli's marvelous lectures on the subject.
 
vanhees71 said:
Since t \in \mathbb{R}, of course
\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}=\left (\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} \right )^*.
In principle the Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation of real arguments for a complex-valued function.

Of course, as always, the use of complex analysis is of great advantage to find solutions. The masters of this approach were Sommerfeld and Pauli. You can read about this in Pauli's marvelous lectures on the subject.

Ok thank you for the information. Should I read some math books about complex analysis or does the basic technique usually discussed in normal calculus books? Where can you watch Pauli's lecture on this?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top