Derivative of sinc(z) in the complex plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function f(z) = sin(z)/z in the context of complex analysis, specifically focusing on its analyticity in the complex plane. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the differentiation process and the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for differentiating f(z), including rewriting it in terms of real and imaginary components and considering the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Questions arise about the separation of real and imaginary parts and the implications of singularities.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on approaches to take, such as using the Laurent series expansion to analyze the function's analyticity. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the derivative and the function's behavior in the complex plane, with no explicit consensus reached on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of separating the real and imaginary parts of the sinc function and the potential complications introduced by singularities. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts at solution and theoretical exploration, with references to the importance of the Cauchy-Riemann equations in establishing analyticity.

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


z=x+iy; <br /> <br /> f(z)=sin(z)/z
find f'(z) and the maximal region in which f(z) is analytic.

Homework Equations



The sinc function is analytic everywhere.

The Attempt at a Solution


Writing f(z) as (z^{-1})sin(z) and differentiating with respect to z using the chain rule I get...
(-z^{-2})sin(z)+cos(z)/z

However, this seems to simple since the context of the chapter of the book this problem comes from is cauchy-riemann. I would suspect I need to put f(z) in the form Re{f(z)}=u(x,y) and Im{f(z)}=v(x,y). Then df/dz would be du/dx+idv/dx. If that is the case then I'm in trouble because the I can't separate the imaginary part from the real part of sinc(z).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always remove the complex value from the denominator:

1. Assume an expression like F(z)/G(z)

2. Multiply it by unity of the form G*(z)/G*(x) where * is the complex conjugation operator.

3. Your expression now looks like F(z)G*(z)/[G(z)G*(z)] = F(z)G*(z)/|G(z)|^2.
 
OK thanks. Now I'm getting somewhere.
So now I have the following:

sin(z)/z=\frac {1}{|z|^2}[z^*sin(z)]
=\frac{1}{(|z|^2)}[(x-iy)\frac{(e^z-e^{-z})}{2i}]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[(x-iy)(e^z-e^{-z})]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{(x+iy)}-xe^{-(x+iy)}-iye^{(x+iy)}+iye^{-(x+iy)}]

I'm not really sure what to do now. I can't group the e^(iy)'s. I'm guessing I'm missing some sort of trick or something.

Thanks!
 
Now go back to the definitions of sin(z); definitions are your friend. :-)
 
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{(x+iy)}-xe^{-(x+iy)}-iye^{(x+iy)}+iye^{-(x+iy)}]
=\frac{1}{|z|^2}[x*sin(z)-y*cos(z)]

I'm not sure how this helps me though because I still have imaginary parts in both terms because of the z. Or, is this when I use cos(z)=Re{e^{iz}} ? That seems like a stretch but it's the only connection I'm making atm.
 
In your reconstruction the final line is incorrect. That cos(z) is wrong.

In any case you want to find the derivative ... if your goal is to find the real and imaginary parts you can find them either before or after the derivative. But you must carry out the Cauchy-Riemann tests as well ...

We've been on a side issue: how to remove the complex values from the denominator. You probably don't want to do that at the start -
 
OK, if we ignore my attempt at a solution, how would you suggest I attack the original question?
 
Just take the Laurent series expansion of \sin z/z and show that its convergence radius is infinity and that it has no singularities anywhere.
 
Since you are saying I only need to find the maximal region of convergence and show that there are no singularities in order to solve; can I assume you think my original solution to finding the derivative was correct? Specifically
(−z^-2)sin(z)+cos(z)/z
 
  • #10
nateHI said:
. If that is the case then I'm in trouble because the I can't separate the imaginary part from the real part of sinc(z).

If you muscle through it you can. You mean you can't separate the real and imaginary part of the expression:

\frac{e^{i(x+iy)}-e^{-i(x+iy)}}{2i(x+iy)}

Bet you can. You know, convert the exponents to sines and consines, multiply top and bottom by conjugate of the denominator, bingo bango.
 
  • #11
I don't know, what you are allowed to assume. For me the most simple solution is to look for the Laurent expansion around 0 and showing that the series is convergent on the entire complex plane, showing that the continuation of the function to the entire complex plane
f(z)=\begin{cases}<br /> \frac{\sin z}{z} &amp; \text{for} \quad z \neq 0,\\<br /> 1 &amp; \text{for} \quad z=0<br /> \end{cases}<br />
in fact is an entire function, i.e., holomorphic on \mathbb{C}.

Your derivative was correct for z \neq 0.
 
  • #12
Since my derivative was correct, I'm wondering if I can always simply pretend my complex function is a real function and differentiate as usual then go back and consider any singularities, branch cuts, etc...
 
  • #13
sin(z)/z=\frac {1}{|z|^2}[z^*sin(z)]
=\frac{1}{(|z|^2)}[(x-iy)\frac{(e^{iz}-e^{-iz})}{2i}]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[(x-iy)(e^{iz}-e^{-iz})]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{i(x+iy)}-xe^{-i(x+iy)}-iye^{i(x+iy)}+iye^{-i(x+iy)}]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{ix-y}-xe^{-ix+y}-iye^{ix-y}+iye^{-ix+y}]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{-y}e^{ix}-xe^ye^{-ix}-iye^{-y}e^{ix}+iye^ye^{-ix}]
=\frac{-i}{(2*|z|^2)}[xe^{-y}(cosx+isinx)-xe^y(cosx-isinx)-iye^{-y}(cosx+isinx)+iye^y(cosx-isinx)]

=\frac{1}{(2*|z|^2)}[-ixe^{-y}(cosx+isinx)+ixe^y(cosx-isinx)-ye^{-y}(cosx+isinx)+ye^y(cosx-isinx)]

=\frac{1}{(2*|z|^2)}[<br /> -ixe^{-y}cosx<br /> +xe^{-y}sinx<br /> +ixe^ycosx<br /> +xe^{y}sinx<br /> +ye^{-y}cosx<br /> -iye^{-y}sinx<br /> +ye^ycosx<br /> -iye^ysinx]

=\frac{1}{(2*|z|^2)}[<br /> +xe^{-y}sinx<br /> +ye^{-y}cosx<br /> +xe^{y}sinx<br /> +ye^{y}cosx<br /> <br /> -ixe^{-y}cosx<br /> -iye^{-y}sinx<br /> +ixe^ycosx<br /> -iye^ysinx<br /> <br /> ]

u(x,y)=e^{-y}(xsinx+ycosx)+e^y(xsinx+ycosx)
v(x,y)=-e^{-y}(xcosx+ysinx)+e^y(xcosx-ysinx)

I was missing an 'i' in the exponent at the very beginning. I'm almost there I think.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
What is this good for?:confused:
 
  • #15
vanhees71 said:
What is this good for?:confused:

In theory, putting f(z) in the form u(x,y)+iv(x,y) allows you to use cauchy-riemann to determine if f(z) is analytic. However, in practice, attempting this has driven me to drinking...so it is good for something!
 
  • #16
nateHI said:
In theory, putting f(z) in the form u(x,y)+iv(x,y) allows you to use cauchy-riemann to determine if f(z) is analytic. However, in practice, attempting this has driven me to drinking...so it is good for something!

That's the best response possible.

while this type of question is rather pedantic it is important for the student to become familiar with the Cauchy-Riemann equations in order to appreciate that they are a very strong condition for analycity (which suggests that only a small class of functions are analytic) and these topics are often taught prior to being introduced to Laurent series or power series representations of complex functions.

Furthermore, by asking students to solve problems in this manner before they learn the Laurent series the student develops an appreciation for the power of the Laurent series and the fact that they are infinitely differentiable.EDIT: Furthermore, the Cauchy-Riemann equations prove useful in proving several important theorems and corollaries that will follow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K