How Does Infinite Freedom Affect Quantum Field Theory?

wphysics
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Currently, I am working on Thermal Quantum Field Theory.

In the introduction to that, many authors point out that infinitely many degrees of freedom and infinite volume are special.

In one reference that I am reading said "The famous equivalence between the Heisenberg and the Schro ̈dinger picture simply breaks down" when the degrees of freedom are infinite.

Could you explain these statements more concretely?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wphysics said:
Currently, I am working on Thermal Quantum Field Theory.
In one reference that I am reading
In questions like this you should quote the specific reference. Have you looked at Umezawa's textbook "Thermofield Dynamics & Condensed States"?

said "The famous equivalence between the Heisenberg and the Schro ̈dinger picture simply breaks down" when the degrees of freedom are infinite.

Could you explain these statements more concretely?
Dirac explained the idea "concretely" in these references:

P.A.M. Dirac, "Quantum Electrodynamics with Dead Wood",
Phys. Rev, vol 139, no 3B, (1965), pB684.

and more extensively in his "Lectures on quantum field theory" given at Yeshiva, 1966. (Some university libraries have a copy of this small book.)

Dirac's explanation is "concrete" in the sense that he takes a specific interaction Hamiltonian, and shows that the dynamics is not sensibly solvable in the Schrodinger picture -- since the Hamiltonian is unbounded and even an infinitesimal time evolution causes a divergence.

However, in the Heisenberg picture, the dynamics is easily solvable as a differential equation, yielding analytic expressions for the time-dependent annihilation/creation operators. Dirac then notes that, "in this sense, the Heisenberg picture is better".

If you can't access the above references, I have written it up in some private notes, but I'd have to convert them from standard Latex to PF latex...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top