Why is the stress-energy tensor symmetric?

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
If we use the "flux of 4-momentum" definition of the stress-energy tensor, it's not clear to me why it should be symmetric. Ie, why should ##T^{01}## (the flux of energy in the x-direction) be equal to ##T^{10}## (the flux of the x-component of momentum in the time direction)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
If we use the "flux of 4-momentum" definition of the stress-energy tensor, it's not clear to me why it should be symmetric. Ie, why should ##T^{01}## (the flux of energy in the x-direction) be equal to ##T^{10}## (the flux of the x-component of momentum in the time direction)?
No, T01 is the flux of energy all right, but T10 is the momentum density. And they are equal because that's what momentum IS: momentum is the flux of energy. Thus in the center of mass frame, the total 3-momentum is zero.
 
Bill_K said:
No, T01 is the flux of energy all right, but T10 is the momentum density. And they are equal because that's what momentum IS: momentum is the flux of energy. Thus in the center of mass frame, the total 3-momentum is zero.

You seem to be saying that it is true by definition. But there is an argument that it must be symmetric that seems like it's not true by definition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy...2.80.99s_stress_theorem.E2.80.94stress_tensor

Also, another article in Wikipedia suggests that if there is a nonzero spin density, then that implies a nonsymmetric stress-energy tensor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_tensor
 
stevendaryl said:
Also, another article in Wikipedia suggests that if there is a nonzero spin density, then that implies a nonsymmetric stress-energy tensor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_tensor
No, both of these may be referring to the "canonical" stress-energy tensor. It's not to be confused with the stress-energy tensor we use in General Relativity Tμν ≡ 2 δLmat/δgμν, which is guaranteed to be symmetric.
 
Last edited:
Bill_K said:
No, both of these may be referring to the "canonical" stress-energy tensor. It's not to be confused with the stress-energy tensor we use in General Relativity Tμν ≡ 2 δLmat/δgμν, which is guaranteed to be symmetric.

Okay, the subject is a little murky to me. But this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belinfante–Rosenfeld_stress-energy_tensor
shows the relationship between the symmetric stress-energy tensor used in GR and the canonical tensor found from Noether's theorem, in the presence of particles with nonzero intrinsic spin.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top