Linear and circular accelerators

  • Thread starter Thread starter dasitmane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular Linear
AI Thread Summary
The government is considering a linear or circular accelerator for its "smart state" initiative focused on research and commercial use. Circular accelerators, while more expensive to build and operate, can generate high-energy particles without requiring extensive length, making them suitable for research purposes. However, concerns arise regarding the cost-effectiveness and suitability of circular accelerators compared to linear ones, particularly in relation to the specific research goals. A comprehensive recommendation should evaluate the merits and limitations of both types of accelerators, alongside existing examples. Ultimately, the choice should align with the government's research objectives and budget constraints.
dasitmane
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.
The Government in its "smart state" initiative wants a linear or circular accelerator for research and commercial use. Compile a recommendation on which one they should use.




2. No equations just need knowledge on Linear (Linac) and Circular (Synchotron) accelerators



3.The circular accelerator is more costly to build and to run than the linear accelerator and can provide very high energy particles without having to be of tremendous length. Bearing in mind that and the government wanting to use an accelerator for research, the Circular accelerator would be best suited for its research needs. The government would be able to comfortably afford a circular accelerator and since they want to use it for research purposes the last thing they would want is incorrect.

Please help me out, what more should I add.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I think this report needs to show that you understand the relative merits and limitations of the types of accelerator. So you should just list them - that would just be about reading your course notes.
You may also want to compare existing accelerators of the different types.

From what you've written - I would wonder what it is about the government's research that particularly suits a circular accelerator. Are you really more likely to be "incorrect" (whatever that means) with a linear accelerator? Perhaps the particular research the govt has in mind is more economically performed on the linear one? Ire good results worth any amount of money?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top