How does General Relativity contradict quantum mechanics?

lizzie96
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
How does General Relativity "contradict" quantum mechanics?

I couldn't work out exactly where to post this. I've heard several times that QM and General relativity "contradict" each other and in certain extreme conditions this becomes a problem. Is this right? I've only heard this in very vague terms and never read a technical explanation of why. Could anyone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do not contradict each other, we just don't know how physics looks like if both are important at the same time.
It is expected that gravity will show quantum-effects as well, but plugging gravity into the formalism of quantum field theory leads to things we cannot calculate (more technical: renormalization does not work).
 
One particular case in which the predictions of GR appear to be inconsistent with QM is black holes. Briefly: GR predicts that a quantum system that falls into a black hole will be destroyed in the singularity at its center, along with the quantum information it contains; but this violates unitarity, a basic principle of QM, which says, basically, that quantum information can't be destroyed. This is called the "black hole information paradox"; the Wikipedia page has a decent overview:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox

The bottom line is that, as we know them today, both GR and QM are incomplete theories, so they don't so much "contradict" each other as fail to cover all possible physical scenarios.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top