Are All Electrons Entangled with Each Other?

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I have a couple of questions about entanglement and decoherence!

1. Sometimes you read that, strictly speaking, all electrons are entangled with one another. But can that be right?! Isn't it at least the case that electrons have to have interacted with one another in the past in order to be entangled?

2. I have been reading about how the environment can cause entanglement to disappear very quickly. Since molecules always occur in environments, doesn't that means that the
spin entanglement that exists between two electrons in an atomic bond will likewise be destroyed? But how then do we explain how the atoms in the molecule stay bonded?

Any thoughts much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
metroplex021 said:
1. Sometimes you read that, strictly speaking, all electrons are entangled with one another.
Not in a relevant way.
But can that be right?! Isn't it at least the case that electrons have to have interacted with one another in the past in order to be entangled?
Well, they do interact, as all electrons are charged.

2. I have been reading about how the environment can cause entanglement to disappear very quickly. Since molecules always occur in environments
You can have an isolated molecule in a vacuum.

, doesn't that means that the
spin entanglement that exists between two electrons in an atomic bond will likewise be destroyed?
No, as long as there is no interaction with them (like incoming light of the right frequency, or collisions with other molecules, or whatever).

But how then do we explain how the atoms in the molecule stay bonded?
You don't need entanglement for that.
 
metroplex021 said:
1. Sometimes you read that, strictly speaking, all electrons are entangled with one another. But can that be right?! Isn't it at least the case that electrons have to have interacted with one another in the past in order to be entangled?
All particles of the same kind (e.g. all electrons or all photons) must have symmetric (for bosons) or antisymmetric (for fermions) wave function. This means that all particles of the same kind are entangled. This kind of entanglement does not require interaction, but usually does not have observational consequences.

metroplex021 said:
2. I have been reading about how the environment can cause entanglement to disappear very quickly. Since molecules always occur in environments, doesn't that means that the
spin entanglement that exists between two electrons in an atomic bond will likewise be destroyed? But how then do we explain how the atoms in the molecule stay bonded?
First, decoherence of object by interaction with environment is quick when the the object is big. An atom is not big, so decoherence of atom is not so quick.

Second, not all coherent properties are destroyed by environment. It depends on the exact nature of interaction with the environment. For example, all interactions with environment are local in the position space, so atom will usually be found at a definite position (not in a superposition of different positions). But most interactions are not sensitive to the spin of the particle, so interaction usually does not destroy the spin-coherence.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top