Hamiltonian for classical harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Hamiltonian for a classical harmonic oscillator, specifically showing that H=ω/2(p^2+q^2). The initial equations provided are H=1/2mq(dot)^2 + k/2q^2, with mq(dot)=p and ω^2=k/m. The participant is encountering extra variables in their solution and seeks clarification on whether these can be simplified. The standard form of the Hamiltonian, H = p^2/(2m) + (1/2)mω^2q^2, can be achieved by appropriately rescaling the variables p and q. This rescaling is identified as a canonical transformation, which is essential for obtaining the desired form.
Jacksond
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working through Leonard Susskinds 'the theoretical minimum' and one of the exercises is to show that H=ω/2(p^2+q^2).

The given equations are H=1/2mq(dot)^2 + k/2q^2, mq(dot)=p and ω^2=k/m.

q is a generalisation of the space variable x, and (dot) is the time derivative if this helps. The solution I am getting contains variables in front of the q and p's inside the brackets, do these reduce somehow? Any proof/explanation would be much appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So ##H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 q^2## is the standard form of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian. Now all you have to do is rescale ##p## and ##q## appropriately to get it into the desired form (this rescaling of the conjugate variables is a special case of what are known as canonical transformations).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top