Help solving Simulink numerical oscillation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving numerical oscillations in Simulink, specifically in a system of chambers connected by a valve. The user has identified a method to calculate oscillation amplitude and conditions for damping in a two-chamber scenario, with results aligning with Simulink outputs. However, they face challenges in extending their mathematical formulation to higher-dimensional cases involving more chambers. They have made progress with three chambers but seek assistance in developing a precise solution similar to the one achieved in the one-dimensional case. The user is looking for feedback on their mathematical approach and ideas for expanding their work to higher dimensions.
Tusike
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I posted a new thread about a week ago, but so far no one was able to help me:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=761892

I wasn't sure if I posted in the right forum, so I'm posting it here hoping to reach a wider audience :)

Any help is greatly appreciated!

-Tusike
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi!

I think I found a solution to my problem in the case of two chambers connected by a valve.

I can calculate the amplitude of the oscillation that occurres, and have given a condition that leads to the oscillation damping, and my results agree with what I see in Simulink.
If anyone would go over my mathematical formulation given in the attachments, I would greatly appreciate that.

However, I'm having trouble expanding my math to more chambers = higher dimensional cases.
So far, I have been able to calculate the amplitude of oscillation for 3 chambers, but couldn't give a precise formulation of a solution such as in the 1D case. I will upload a document of my calculations for this as soon as I type it in.

I presented some ideas in the 1D case which could be used to expand to higher dimensions. If anyone could give me ideas on how to do that, and if the way I'm trying seems to be correct or not, I would also be very thankful.

Thanks!

-Tusike
 

Attachments

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top