Gravitational Wave Observatories: Testing & Feasibility

gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2
This may be a stupid question, but have the various gravitational wave observatories around the world been tested by seeing if they can detect man-made gravitational waves, and thus work as expected? Or would it be too unfeasible to make them, even given the extreme sensitivity that the detectors have already demonstrated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The detectors look for gravitational waves from astrophysical sources. Gravitational waves generated by non-self-gravitating sources like humans are fantastically small in amplitude so there's no point in even trying to detect them. You need extremely powerful astrophysical events to produce gravitational waves that have even a hopelessly small chance of being detected. Recently a more fruitful venue of gravitational wave detection comes from inflation.
 
gildomar said:
Or would it be too unfeasible to make them, even given the extreme sensitivity that the detectors have already demonstrated?

Yes. In order to make gravitational waves that we would have a chance of detecting, we would have to be able to wiggle around planet-sized, or at least asteroid-sized, masses however we pleased. The gravitational waves that would be produced by wiggling around even the largest masses we could possibly control are way too weak for our detectors to detect.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top