What is G-Force Before Engines Turn On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DocZaius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    G-force Ground
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the g-force value before rocket engines turn on should be considered 1 g-force or 0 g-force. Proponents of 1 g-force argue that astronauts experience Earth's gravitational pull, equating to 1 g-force even before ignition. Conversely, those supporting 0 g-force emphasize that the rocket's acceleration is zero while stationary on the ground, corresponding to 0 m/s². The conversation highlights the distinction between "proper acceleration" and "coordinate acceleration," suggesting that the interpretation may depend on the chosen reference frame. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards proper acceleration being the relevant measure in this context.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
I was looking at this graph and wondering what the value of the graph would be before the engines turn on. Should it be 1 g-force or 0 g-force? (the "force" in g-force being a misnomer as it is a measure of acceleration, not force) Below are arguments for each:

Why it should be 1 g-force: We experience 1 g-force of acceleration on Earth's surface. The astronauts would also experience 1 g-force before the engines turn on.

Why it should be 0 g-force: The acceleration of the rocket (in m/s^2) is clearly 0 while the rocket is still on the ground. 0 m/s^2 corresponds to 0 g-force.

Which is the correct interpretation? Or is this just a problem of choosing your zero? In that case what is the convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DocZaius said:
Why it should be 1 g-force: We experience 1 g-force of acceleration on Earth's surface. The astronauts would also experience 1 g-force before the engines turn on.
That's "proper acceleration":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_acceleration

DocZaius said:
Why it should be 0 g-force: The acceleration of the rocket (in m/s^2) is clearly 0 while the rocket is still on the ground. 0 m/s^2 corresponds to 0 g-force..
That's "coordiante acceleration" in the rest frame of the surface:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration

DocZaius said:
Which is the correct interpretation?
If it says "G-force" it probably means proper acceleration. Also because it drops to 0 during stage changes. Coordinate acceleration would drop to -1g.
 
Ah I should have paid attention to the stage changes! No ambiguity there. Thank you!
 
DocZaius said:
Ah I should have paid attention to the stage changes!

And also the figure caption:

8. With the cut-off of the S-IVB's first burn, the vehicle is in orbit with zero acceleration.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top