Lorentz Invariant: What & When?

Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
What makes an equation lorentz-covariant? When is an equation lorentz-invariant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratzinger said:
What makes an equation lorentz-covariant? When is an equation lorentz-invariant?
I'm not sure but I believe that an equation is Lorentz invariant if it has the same form in all inertial coordinate systems and that Lorentz covariant equation is one which is Lorentz invariant and that all the constants in the equation are Lorentz scalars.

Pete
 
Here's one version of the Lorentz transformation equations, which covers the case where the primed frame is moving at velocity v along the x-axis of the unprimed frame:

x' = \gamma (x - vt)
y' = y
z' = z
t' = \gamma (t - vx/c^2)
where \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}

and

x = \gamma (x' + vt')
y = y'
z = z'
t = \gamma (t' + vx'/c^2)

So what Lorentz-invariance means is that if you take some equation for a law of physics written in terms of x,y,z,t coordinates and use the Lorentz transform to make substitutions and rewrite this equation in terms of x',y',z',t' coordinates, the equation will end up looking the same as if you had just replaced x with x', y with y', z with z' and t with t'--the equation should have exactly the same form in both coordinate systems.

Here's an example, involving "Galilei-invariance" rather than Lorentz-invariance because the math is simpler. The Galilei transform for transforming between different frames in Newtonian mechanics looks like this:

x' = x - vt
y' = y
z' = z
t' = t

and

x = x' + vt'
y = y'
z = z'
t = t'

To say a certain physical equation is "Galilei-invariant" just means the form of the equation is unchanged if you make these substitutions. For example, suppose at time t you have a mass m_1 at position (x_1 , y_1 , z_1) and another mass m_2 at position (x_2 , y_2 , z_2 ) in your reference frame. Then the Newtonian equation for the gravitational force between them would be:

F = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{(x_1 - x_2 )^2 + (y_1 - y_2 )^2 + (z_1 - z_2 )^2}

Now, suppose we want to transform into a new coordinate system moving at velocity v along the x-axis of the first one. In this coordinate system, at time t' the mass m_1 has coordinates (x'_1 , y'_1 , z'_1) and the mass m_2 has coordinates (x'_2 , y'_2 , z'_2 ). Using the Galilei transformation, we can figure how the force would look in this new coordinate system, by substituting in x_1 = x'_1 + v t', x_2 = x'_2 + v t', y_1 = y'_1, y_2 = y'_2, and so forth. With these substitutions, the above equation becomes:

F = \frac{G m_1 m_2 }{(x'_1 + vt' - (x'_2 + vt'))^2 + (y'_1 - y'_2 )^2 + (z'_1 - z'_2 )^2}

and you can see that this simplifies to:

F = \frac{G m_1 m_2 }{(x'_1 - x'_2 )^2 + (y'_1 - y'_2 )^2 + (z'_1 - z'_2 )^2}

In other words, the equation has exactly the same form in both coordinate systems. This is what it means to be "Galilei invariant". More generally, if you have any physical equation which computes some quantity (say, force) as a function of various space and time coordinates, like f(x,y,z,t) [of course it may have more than one of each coordinate, like the x_1 and x_2 above, and it may be a function of additional variables as well, like m_1 and m_2 above] then for this equation to be "Galilei invariant", it must satisfy:
f(x'+vt',y',z',t') = f(x',y',z',t')

So in the same way, an equation that's Lorentz-invariant should satisfy:

f( \gamma (x' + vt' ), y' , z', \gamma (t' + vx' /c^2 ) ) = f(x' ,y' ,z' , t')
 
Last edited:
Ratzinger said:
What makes an equation lorentz-covariant? When is an equation lorentz-invariant?

A function "f" is Lorentz invariant,if its spinor rank is 0, i.e. is a Lorentz/SL(2,\mathbb{C}) scalar. Lorentz covariance is achived when putting in the same equation quantites which transform under O(1,3) after a finite dimensional representations.

Daniel.
 
Thanks for answering. I found this at Wikipedia:

Lorentz covariance is a term in physics for the property of space time, that in two different frames of reference, located at the same event in spacetime but moving relative to each other, all non-gravitational laws must make the same predictions for identical experiments. A physical quantity is said to be Lorentz covariant if it transforms under a given representation of the Lorentz group. Quantities which remain the same under Lorentz transformations are said to be Lorentz invariant (i.e. they transform under the trivial representation).

According to the representation theory of the Lorentz group, Lorentz covariant quantities are built out of scalars, four-vectors, four-tensors, and spinors.

The space-time interval is a Lorentz-invariant quantity, as is the Minkowski norm of any four-vector.

Equations which are true in any inertial reference frame are also said to be Lorentz covariant (some use the term invariant here). Lorentz covariant equations can always be written in terms Lorentz covariant quantities. According to the principle of relativity all fundamental equations of physics must be Lorentz covariant.

Note: this usage of the term covariant should not be confused with the related concept of a covariant vector. On manifolds, the words covariant and contravariant refer to how objects transform under general coordinate transformations. Confusingly, both covariant and contravariant four-vectors can be Lorentz covariant quantities.

I didn't know how great this Wikipedia site is...looks I have to spend some more time there.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top