Define Free Will: Satisfactory Definition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skomatth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Free will
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on defining "free will" within the framework of logical positivism, specifically in the context of the proposition "[agent] A has free will." A proposed definition suggests that at any time t, even with complete knowledge of A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis can predict A's state at a future time t+d. This raises questions about how this definition differentiates "freely willed" actions from random occurrences. Participants highlight the challenge of defining an internal condition like will through external behavior and whether free will is an unanalysable concept. Additionally, it is suggested that the definition should include that the agent's actions are rationally comprehensible and aimed at achieving specific purposes, adding depth to the understanding of free will.
Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Following the the logical positivist convention of defining a term in use I am seeking a definition of free will as it occurs in the proposition "[agent]A has free will". This will involve formulating an equivalent proposition which uses no synonyms of "free will".

I believe it can be done in this way: "At any time t, even if all facts are known about A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis could ever be able to predict A's physical or psychological state at time t+d."

Is this a satisfactory definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skomatth said:
Following the the logical positivist convention of defining a term in use I am seeking a definition of free will as it occurs in the proposition "[agent]A has free will". This will involve formulating an equivalent proposition which uses no synonyms of "free will".

I believe it can be done in this way: "At any time t, even if all facts are known about A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis could ever be able to predict A's physical or psychological state at time t+d."

Is this a satisfactory definition?

How does this distinguish "freely willed" from random? In general how can you define an inner condition like will in terms of external behavior?
 
Good point. Do you think free will is an unanalysable concept or could this be defined differently?
 
selfAdjoint said:
How does this distinguish "freely willed" from random? In general how can you define an inner condition like will in terms of external behavior?

You need to add a rider to the effect that the agent's action is nonetheless
rationally comprehensible ie aimed at achieving some purpose.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top