No signal of my normaliser, Western blot

  • Thread starter Thread starter mountain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around troubleshooting issues with B actin as a normalization control in protein experiments. The main concern is the inconsistent detection of B actin signals after stripping filters, even when target protein intensities appear consistent across wells. Participants suggest that the problem could stem from the stripping process, the antibody used, or inherent variability in B actin levels among samples. Recommendations include checking the stripping method, performing a dilution series to optimize antibody concentration, and ensuring proper gel running conditions. There are also concerns about potential loss of signals during the stripping process, with some users noting that signals can return upon reprobing. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of careful experimental design and troubleshooting to ensure reliable results.
mountain
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear everybody,

Please help me out.

I am doing an experiment where i use B actin as the normalizer. The problem is after i have stripped the filters then some of the wells did not have the B actin signals. Even if the intensity of the target protein in that well had the same strength as the others, so this could not be a loading problem, could it? What is wrong? I bought the mouse monoclonal antibody against human B actin from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Has anyone used this before? I used 500X dilution. Should i reduce the dilution factor? Do you know any well known manufacturers for selling good antibody against human B actin?

Thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I don't know if there's a problem with your beta-actin detection method (anything from a bad antibody to a bad method), a problem with damaging/washing off the beta-actin when you strip the antibody off, or if your samples are truly variable in the amount of beta-actin in them (this is why you need to choose the control carefully for normalizing; you could be loading unevenly or there could be variation in beta actin in your samples, which would indicate it's not a good protein to normalize to in your experiments).

The first place I'd check is whether it's in the stripping step or antibody. Try detecting beta-actin first, before the other protein of interest, and see if you still get the variation. If you do, it's not the stripping but something else, but if you don't have the same problem, then you need to troubleshoot your stripping step.

The other thing you can do, and should have started with, is a dilution series with your antibody to determine the optimal dilution for your system. If you're detecting your protein in some lanes but not others, then I wouldn't suspect the antibody.

Have you confirmed that you're running the gels an appropriate time and with proper acrylamide content to detect both your protein and the beta actin? Could your beta actin still be trapped in the loading gel (especially considering your other post asking about uneven running of gels)?
 
what are you using as a stripping buffer? glycine at pH 3?

personally, i would not strip to detect the actin unless you absolutely have to.
 
Thanks for the replies.

I have experienced that after stripping then one of my filters lost all of the signals even the MW marker. I wonder if stripping can do this as a side effect? Yesterday i stripped again and then reprobed with B actin and this time i have got the signals back. Have you experienced this?

Thanks again!
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Back
Top