What is the inverse Fourier transform of e^{-|x|}?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the inverse Fourier transform of the function f(x) = e^{-|x|}. The Fourier transform is established as \hat f(\omega) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{1}{1+\omega^2}, and the inverse transform is stated to be \hat \hat f(-x) = e^{-|x|}. The user seeks assistance in calculating the integral \sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} dt, expressing difficulty with traditional methods. A solution is suggested using complex contour integration and the residue theorem, which involves integrating along a closed contour in the complex plane. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the suggested method and a commitment to work through the solution.
MrSeaman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I got an exam in calculus in a few weeks, and lots of questions coming up. Here's one of them:

We learned that the Fourier Transform of

f(x) = e^{-|x|}
is
\hat f(\omega) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}\frac{1}{1+\omega^2}

I've got no problem with this one. Now, since \hat f(\omega) is Lebesgue - integrable, the inverse Fourier transform exists and should be

\hat \hat f(-x) = e^{-|x|}

To show this the 'hard way', I want to calculate the integral

\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int \limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} \mathrm{d} t

Well, I just don't know how to do this one. Partial Integration doesn't seem to work, and I can't find neither a good substition nor a clever use of Fubini's Theorem.

Would be thankful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never seen it derived directly. However, it is easily found in a table of definite integrals.
 
MrSeaman said:
To show this the 'hard way', I want to calculate the integral

\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \pi}} \int \limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{1+t^2} e^{i \omega t} \mathrm{d} t

One way to do this is by using complex contour integration and the residue theorem.

Integrate

\int \frac{1}{1+z^2} e^{i \omega z} \mathrm{d} t

along the closed contour that consists of the portion of the real axis from -R to R together with a closing counterclockwise semicircle of radius R in the upper halfplane. Let R\rightarrow \infty. Then:the closed contour encloses a pole at z=i; the contibution from the semicircle goes to zero.

Repeat for a clockwise semicircle in the lower halfplane.

Regards,
George
 
Last edited:
As I was just told, it seems to be done by using the residue theorem of complex analysis.

edit: George was faster, thanks! Working it out...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top