Using Partial Fractions to Simplify Summations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using partial fractions to simplify the summation of the series 1/(4k^2 - 1). The correct partial fraction decomposition is confirmed as 1 / 2(2k-1) - 1 / 2(2k+1). Participants clarify the connection between the summation and the series, ultimately leading to the conclusion that Σ_{k=1}^n (1/(4k^2-1)) equals n/(2n+1). The initial confusion about the notation is addressed, emphasizing the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions. The exercise is successfully completed with the correct understanding of the summation.
Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
I don't know how the latex coding works sorry...

I have to use the partial fraction technique on 1/(4k^2 - 1)...
So far so good and I get 1 / 2(2k-1) - 1 / 2(2k+1), is this correct?


I now need to show that if E is the sum of terms where k=1 and n is the unknow.

E 1 / 4k^2 - 1 = n / 2n + 1

Please help :cry:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, notice: 4k^2 - 1 = (2k-1)(2k+1)

I don't understand the second part, it makes no sense. If it was asking for the value of 'n' it would make sense. There's no reason to ask whether E can be expressed in that form when k = 1, I can't see why a teacher would want to ask it.

Also, what does this have to do with sequences/series?

Edit: I see about the sigma notation now, totally misunderstood the question the first time, don't know how to solve it though.
 
Last edited:
Natasha1 said:
I don't know how the latex coding works sorry...
I have to use the partial fraction technique on 1/(4k^2 - 1)...
So far so good and I get 1 / 2(2k-1) - 1 / 2(2k+1), is this correct?
I now need to show that if E is the sum of terms where k=1 and n is the unknow.
E 1 / 4k^2 - 1 = n / 2n + 1
Please help :cry:
\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 \frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}
k= 2 \frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}
k= 3 \frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}
k= 4 \frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}
Do you see what happens when you add those?
 
HallsofIvy said:
\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 \frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}
k= 2 \frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}
k= 3 \frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}
k= 4 \frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}
Do you see what happens when you add those?


Yes thanks I have now completed the exercise :-). Thanks!
 
HallsofIvy said:
\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 \frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}
k= 2 \frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}
k= 3 \frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}
k= 4 \frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}
Do you see what happens when you add those?

Exercise done thanks!
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top